From Project Mailer
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Norman Mailer: Works and Days
PrefaceLennon IntroductionLucas IntroductionAcknowledgments and Appreciations
First EditionsKey TextsBibliographiesBiographiesCriticismCultural Backgrounds
Works IndexNM’s IntroductionsThe Big BiteMailer for MayorAbbott Affair
Days IndexImportant Dates
Index of NamesWorks CategoriesDays Categories
Wikipedia book BooksProject page Projects

St. George and the Godfather. New York: New American Library, late October, softcover. Nonfiction narrative on the 1972 political conventions, 229 pp., $1.50.

Dedication: “To dad (alias Isaac Barnett Mailer).” A September publication date is given on the copyright page; it is incorrect, as explained in 72.12, 72.19. Rpt: Advance excerpts appeared in Life (72.10) and New York Review of Books (72.20); 76.5; with an introduction by John Leonard in the first hardcover and (simultaneous) softcover editions. New York: Arbor House (83.49); 98.7 (partial).



  • Cook, Bruce (November 4, 1972). "Aquarius Rex". National Observer. pp. 1–15. Positive.
  • Lehmann-Haupt, Christopher (October 16, 1972). "St. George and the Godfather". New York Times. p. 39. Retrieved 2018-12-18.
  • Solotaroff, Robert (January 15, 1973). "The Glop of the Wad". Nation. pp. 87–89. Positive.
  • Wills, Garry (October 15, 1972). "Aquarius Returns to Miami". New York Times Book Review. pp. 1, 22. Positive.


  • Adams, Laura (1977). Existential Battles: the Growth of Norman Mailer. Athens: Ohio UP. pp. 171–174.
  • Bailey, Jennifer (1979). "The Novelist versus the Reporter". Norman Mailer: Quick-Change Artist. New York: Harper & Row. pp. 105–115.
  • Ehrlich, Robert (1978). Norman Mailer: The Radical as Hipster. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press. pp. 143–152.
  • Leonard, John (1972). "Introduction". St. George and the Godfather. New York: Arbor House.
  • Radford, Jean (1975). Norman Mailer: A Critical Study. London; Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. pp. 165–175.
  • Smith, Gordon Michael (October 26, 2012). "When McGovern Met Mailer". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved 2018-12-18.