Jump to content

An American Dream Expanded: Difference between revisions

Moved two letters to the letters §. Updated link.
(correct link for redirect)
(Moved two letters to the letters §. Updated link.)
Line 74: Line 74:
|File:Trotter Letter 1965.jpg|A 1965 letter from Mr. William Trotter to Mr. A. Wallace expressing his support for Norman Mailer.
|File:Trotter Letter 1965.jpg|A 1965 letter from Mr. William Trotter to Mr. A. Wallace expressing his support for Norman Mailer.
|File:19650923-Mary.Bancroft.Letter.JPG|Mary Bancroft offers her strong support for Mailer in this 1965 letter.  
|File:19650923-Mary.Bancroft.Letter.JPG|Mary Bancroft offers her strong support for Mailer in this 1965 letter.  
|File:19650417 Letter.jpg|Granville Hicks, in his review of Norman Mailer’s ''An American Dream'' [''SR'', March 20], tells us that Mailer’s main character has no reality, the other characters are “dummies,” the writing is sloppy, and the plot is absurd. One might say the same about Dostoevsky’s ''Notes from the Underground''. Perhaps ''An American Dream'' is not a great book, but it is most certainly not a “bad joke.” It contains scenes of great power and pages of brilliant imagery. It holds one’s interest. It is an entertaining book to read. ~W. K. MASON, Madison, Wis.
|File:BillPowers SaturdayReview Page1.jpg|In his [[An American Dream Expanded/Definition of Selfhood|letter to the ''Saturday Review'']] (June 5, 1965), Bill Powers responds to criticism that ''An American Dream'' is a “literary hoax” and argues that through murder Rojack places himself “in the position to rebegin his life.”
}}
}}
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
Line 85: Line 87:
|File:Dana - North Am Review Page1.jpg|[[TheNorthAmericanReview/RobertDana|Robert Dana's review of ''An American Dream'']], published July 1965 in ''The North American Review'', declares the novel to be Mailer's "best and most powerful novel since ''[[The Naked and the Dead]]''" despite what Dana sees as a poor conclusion and a lack of meaning in the main character's actions.
|File:Dana - North Am Review Page1.jpg|[[TheNorthAmericanReview/RobertDana|Robert Dana's review of ''An American Dream'']], published July 1965 in ''The North American Review'', declares the novel to be Mailer's "best and most powerful novel since ''[[The Naked and the Dead]]''" despite what Dana sees as a poor conclusion and a lack of meaning in the main character's actions.
|File:Lewis Nichols In and Out of books.jpg|Lewis Nichols In and Out of Books
|File:Lewis Nichols In and Out of books.jpg|Lewis Nichols In and Out of Books
|File:19650417 Letter.jpg|Granville Hicks, in his review of Norman Mailer’s ''An American Dream'' [''SR'', March 20], tells us that Mailer’s main character has no reality, the other characters are “dummies,” the writing is sloppy, and the plot is absurd. One might say the same about Dostoevsky’s ''Notes from the Underground''. Perhaps ''An American Dream'' is not a great book, but it is most certainly not a “bad joke.” It contains scenes of great power and pages of brilliant imagery. It holds one’s interest. It is an entertaining book to read. ~W. K. MASON, Madison, Wis.
|File:BillPowers SaturdayReview Page1.jpg|In his [[SaturdayReview/BillPowers|letter to the Book Review Editor]] at the ''[[w:Saturday Review (U.S. magazine)|Saturday Review]]'' dated June 5, 1965, Bill Powers responds to criticism that ''An American Dream'' is a "literary hoax" and argues that through murder Rojack places himself "in the position to rebegin his life."
}}
}}
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>


[[Category:Projects]]
[[Category:Projects]]