Jump to content

An American Dream Expanded: Difference between revisions

movie review from letters section
(move review out of letters)
(movie review from letters section)
Line 89: Line 89:
|File:Lewis Nichols In and Out of books.jpg|Lewis Nichols In and Out of Books
|File:Lewis Nichols In and Out of books.jpg|Lewis Nichols In and Out of Books
|File:19650417 Letter.jpg|Granville Hicks, in his review of Norman Mailer’s ''An American Dream'' [''SR'', March 20], tells us that Mailer’s main character has no reality, the other characters are “dummies,” the writing is sloppy, and the plot is absurd. One might say the same about Dostoevsky’s ''Notes from the Underground''. Perhaps ''An American Dream'' is not a great book, but it is most certainly not a “bad joke.” It contains scenes of great power and pages of brilliant imagery. It holds one’s interest. It is an entertaining book to read. ~W. K. MASON, Madison, Wis.
|File:19650417 Letter.jpg|Granville Hicks, in his review of Norman Mailer’s ''An American Dream'' [''SR'', March 20], tells us that Mailer’s main character has no reality, the other characters are “dummies,” the writing is sloppy, and the plot is absurd. One might say the same about Dostoevsky’s ''Notes from the Underground''. Perhaps ''An American Dream'' is not a great book, but it is most certainly not a “bad joke.” It contains scenes of great power and pages of brilliant imagery. It holds one’s interest. It is an entertaining book to read. ~W. K. MASON, Madison, Wis.
|File:BillPowers SaturdayReview Page1.jpg|In his letter to the Book Review Editor at the ''Saturday Review'', dated June 5, 1965, Bill Powers responds to criticism that ''An American Dream'' is a "literary hoax" and argues that through murder Rojack places himself "in the position to rebegin his life."
|File:BillPowers SaturdayReview Page2.jpg|Bill Powers, Saturday Review, Page 2.
}}
}}
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>


[[Category:Projects]]
[[Category:Projects]]
239

edits