10,132
edits
Lipton’s Journal/February 7, 1955/486: Difference between revisions
Lipton’s Journal/February 7, 1955/486 (view source)
Revision as of 08:24, 19 April 2021
, 19 April 2021Added hover notes.
m (Added italics.) |
m (Added hover notes.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Let’s start with orgasm, frigidity, power and castration. Nobody understands these things. They are written and talked about endlessly, but they are never understood. And I think I have a clue to them. I am continuing on the premise that the essential nature of humans is bisexual. And I start from mother, the masculine other who we learn is a woman. Other “proof” is the necessity of life itself to give-and-take, to act and to understand. My bisexual thesis is anchored in my entire concept of the duality of everything. So, a step further, I make the postulate that the bisexual nature is solidified, typed, set at a level, ''a mechanical functioning except under stress'', and so decisions are made to become a sexual type—so necessary to stay alive in society even at a despised level like the fag—but, sexual typology is the loosest and the least stable because it is the part of man society has insisted upon burying. | Let’s start with orgasm, frigidity, power and castration. Nobody understands these things. They are written and talked about endlessly, but they are never understood. And I think I have a clue to them. I am continuing on the premise that the essential nature of humans is bisexual. And I start from mother, the masculine other who we learn is a woman. Other “proof” is the necessity of life itself to give-and-take, to act and to understand. My bisexual thesis is anchored in my entire concept of the duality of everything. So, a step further, I make the postulate that the bisexual nature is solidified, typed, set at a level, ''a mechanical functioning except under stress'', and so decisions are made to become a sexual type—so necessary to stay alive in society even at a despised level like the fag—but, sexual typology is the loosest and the least stable because it is the part of man society has insisted upon burying. | ||
So, only with psychoanalysis and with [[w:Alfred Kinsey|Kinsey]] does the collective sociostasis which is equal to society slowly begin to recognize the great danger it is in unless it narrows the gap between the sup and the er, for all violent expressions in and against society are expressions of a great gap between sup and er—hence the comparative deep contradictory violence of the Soviet Union as opposed to the surface violence and crankery of the United States. Well, I postulate crude sexual typologies and the social need to limn (good old fleshing of the limb) the sexual type. And I’m the first to make a penetrative contribution to it. How my conservation tricks my anarchism, so that a hundred years from now I’ll be a reactionary whose ideas must be overthrown. | So, only with psychoanalysis and with [[w:Alfred Kinsey|Kinsey]] does the collective sociostasis which is equal to society slowly begin to recognize the great danger it is in unless it narrows the gap between the {{LJ:sup}} and the {{LJ:er}}, for all violent expressions in and against society are expressions of a great gap between sup and er—hence the comparative deep contradictory violence of the Soviet Union as opposed to the surface violence and crankery of the United States. Well, I postulate crude sexual typologies and the social need to limn (good old fleshing of the limb) the sexual type. And I’m the first to make a penetrative contribution to it. How my conservation tricks my anarchism, so that a hundred years from now I’ll be a reactionary whose ideas must be overthrown. | ||
Anyway, the essential decision which is made and which of course alters according to other needs and pressures and deep er demands is to take sex frontally as a bisexual (the healthier course I believe) or to take sex unisexually and gain the benefits and uncreative disadvantages of that. But that once done, the orgasm is affected. I suspect with my intuitions that the state of the sexual soul is close to the orgasm of the bisexual which is less intense than the orgasm of the unisexual (how we give and how we take is of course a great part of this. To have a truly good orgasm one must be able to take with the body). Which is why my orgasms are comparatively pissy except on Liptons where the time is extended—that is the time in which I take my orgasm. | Anyway, the essential decision which is made and which of course alters according to other needs and pressures and deep er demands is to take sex frontally as a bisexual (the healthier course I believe) or to take sex unisexually and gain the benefits and uncreative disadvantages of that. But that once done, the orgasm is affected. I suspect with my intuitions that the state of the sexual soul is close to the orgasm of the bisexual which is less intense than the orgasm of the unisexual (how we give and how we take is of course a great part of this. To have a truly good orgasm one must be able to take with the body). Which is why my orgasms are comparatively pissy except on Liptons where the time is extended—that is the time in which I take my orgasm. | ||