Talk:The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/The Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision: Difference between revisions
m (Reply.) |
Jules Carry (talk | contribs) m (Reply.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: {{u|Grlucas}} I've removed the parenthetical citations and corrected the placement of the shortened footnotes. I have no idea how the real quotes were replaced with fang quotes. I was directly copying and pasting from the source. Is this is an issue? [[User:CLedoux|CLedoux]] ([[User talk:CLedoux|talk]]) 10:21, 26 June 2021 (EDT) | : {{u|Grlucas}} I've removed the parenthetical citations and corrected the placement of the shortened footnotes. I have no idea how the real quotes were replaced with fang quotes. I was directly copying and pasting from the source. Is this is an issue? [[User:CLedoux|CLedoux]] ([[User talk:CLedoux|talk]]) 10:21, 26 June 2021 (EDT) | ||
::{{Reply to|CLedoux}} Progress! Though these items still need attention: (1) there should be no space between the punctuation mark and your footnote code (see: [[PM:RA#In-text_Citations]]; (2) end punctuation needs to be moved to inside the closing quotation mark (when applicable); (3) and, yes, fang quotation marks (and apostrophes) need to be corrected. Thanks. —[[User:Grlucas|Grlucas]] ([[User talk:Grlucas|talk]]) 14:30, 26 June 2021 (EDT) | ::{{Reply to|CLedoux}} Progress! Though these items still need attention: (1) there should be no space between the punctuation mark and your footnote code (see: [[PM:RA#In-text_Citations]]; (2) end punctuation needs to be moved to inside the closing quotation mark (when applicable); (3) and, yes, fang quotation marks (and apostrophes) need to be corrected. Thanks. —[[User:Grlucas|Grlucas]] ([[User talk:Grlucas|talk]]) 14:30, 26 June 2021 (EDT) | ||
:::{{Reply to|CLedoux|Grlucas}} I worked on these issues, but I would go over the article again to be sure there aren’t more errors that popped up. --[[User:Jules Carry|Jules Carry]] ([[User talk:Jules Carry|talk]]) 15:03, 26 June 2021 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:03, 26 June 2021
Remediating Notes
CLedoux Really great work. Please remove the parenthetical citation in-text; these are not needed with the shortened footnotes. The footnotes should be exactly where the parenthetical citations appear in the text; please do not move these. Also, the texts real quotes “” have been replaced by fang quotes " — do you know how this happened? —Grlucas (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2021 (EDT)
- Grlucas I've removed the parenthetical citations and corrected the placement of the shortened footnotes. I have no idea how the real quotes were replaced with fang quotes. I was directly copying and pasting from the source. Is this is an issue? CLedoux (talk) 10:21, 26 June 2021 (EDT)
- @CLedoux: Progress! Though these items still need attention: (1) there should be no space between the punctuation mark and your footnote code (see: PM:RA#In-text_Citations; (2) end punctuation needs to be moved to inside the closing quotation mark (when applicable); (3) and, yes, fang quotation marks (and apostrophes) need to be corrected. Thanks. —Grlucas (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2021 (EDT)
- @CLedoux and Grlucas: I worked on these issues, but I would go over the article again to be sure there aren’t more errors that popped up. --Jules Carry (talk) 15:03, 26 June 2021 (EDT)
- @CLedoux: Progress! Though these items still need attention: (1) there should be no space between the punctuation mark and your footnote code (see: PM:RA#In-text_Citations; (2) end punctuation needs to be moved to inside the closing quotation mark (when applicable); (3) and, yes, fang quotation marks (and apostrophes) need to be corrected. Thanks. —Grlucas (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2021 (EDT)