Jump to content

The Mailer Review/Volume 2, 2008/A Dialogue on Mailer’s Novels: Difference between revisions

m
Added abstract.
(Created page.)
 
m (Added abstract.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MR02}}
{{MR02}}
{{byline|last=Begiebing|first=Robert J.|last1=Bufithis|first1=Philip}}
{{abstract|Are Mailer’s novels visionary narratives that offer the boon of a new consciousness or do they present more sensation than substance? Is he a major philosophical novelist of our time or are his ideas often untenable? Mailer scholars Robert J. Begiebing and Philip Bufithis debate these and related questions.}}


{{byline|last=Begiebing|first=Robert J.|last1=Bufithis|first1=Philip}}


''Mailer’s nonfiction has been honored with praises and prizes. One might sensibly argue that it contributed to a revolution in the consciousness of his time. But his fiction is still a matter of vigorous debate, and the Mailer Question persists. Simply put: How good are his novels? Two Mailer scholars having drinks and dinner two years ago in Provincetown discussed the Question. The night wore on, the restaurant closed, but their discussion continued in the months that followed and developed into this dialogue. It opens with two overview statements on Mailer the novelist, debates three novels, then assesses Mailer’s other novels starting with ''The Naked and the Dead''.''
''Mailer’s nonfiction has been honored with praises and prizes. One might sensibly argue that it contributed to a revolution in the consciousness of his time. But his fiction is still a matter of vigorous debate, and the Mailer Question persists. Simply put: How good are his novels? Two Mailer scholars having drinks and dinner two years ago in Provincetown discussed the Question. The night wore on, the restaurant closed, but their discussion continued in the months that followed and developed into this dialogue. It opens with two overview statements on Mailer the novelist, debates three novels, then assesses Mailer’s other novels starting with ''The Naked and the Dead''.''