Jump to content

An American Dream Expanded: Difference between revisions

Undo revision 7605 by Mango Masala (talk)
(Undo revision 7605 by Mango Masala (talk))
Tag: Undo
Line 77: Line 77:
|align=left
|align=left
|File:19650417 Letter.jpg|Granville Hicks, in his review of Norman Mailer’s ''An American Dream'' [''SR'', March 20], tells us that Mailer’s main character has no reality, the other characters are “dummies,” the writing is sloppy, and the plot is absurd. One might say the same about Dostoevsky’s ''Notes from the Underground''. Perhaps ''An American Dream'' is not a great book, but it is most certainly not a “bad joke.” It contains scenes of great power and pages of brilliant imagery. It holds one’s interest. It is an entertaining book to read. ~W. K. MASON, Madison, Wis.
|File:19650417 Letter.jpg|Granville Hicks, in his review of Norman Mailer’s ''An American Dream'' [''SR'', March 20], tells us that Mailer’s main character has no reality, the other characters are “dummies,” the writing is sloppy, and the plot is absurd. One might say the same about Dostoevsky’s ''Notes from the Underground''. Perhaps ''An American Dream'' is not a great book, but it is most certainly not a “bad joke.” It contains scenes of great power and pages of brilliant imagery. It holds one’s interest. It is an entertaining book to read. ~W. K. MASON, Madison, Wis.
[[File:Trotter Letter 1965.jpg|thumb|A letter from Mr. William Trotter to Mr. Wallace expressing his support for Norman Mailer.]]
}}
}}
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
== Reviews ==
== Reviews ==
{{Gallery
{{Gallery
233

edits