10,132
edits
Norman Mailer: Works and Days/Bibliography/Criticism: Difference between revisions
Norman Mailer: Works and Days/Bibliography/Criticism (view source)
Revision as of 07:42, 24 March 2019
, 24 March 2019→S: Completed S entries.
(→S: More S entries.) |
(→S: Completed S entries.) |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
===S=== | ===S=== | ||
* {{Anchor|Schaub (1991)}}{{cite book |last=Schaub |first=Thomas Hill |date=1991 |chapter=Rebel without a Cause: Mailer’s White Negro and Consensus Liberalism |title=American Fiction in the Cold War |url= |location=Madison |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |pages=137–162 |isbn= |author-link= }} Attempt to deconstruct “The White Negro” ([[59.8a]]) into consensus liberalism. | |||
* {{Anchor|Scheffler (1983)}}{{cite journal |last=Scheffler |first=Judith A. |date=1983 |title=The Prisoner as Creator in Norman Mailer’s ''The Executioner’s Song'' |url= |journal=Midwest Quarterly |volume=24 |issue=summer |pages=400–411 |access-date= }} Rpt: [[#Bloom (1986)|Bloom (1986)]]. Focus on Gilmore’s self-definition. | |||
* {{Anchor|Schickel (1985)}}{{cite book |last=Schickel |first=Richard |date=1985 |chapter=Super Hero, Super Victim; The Politics of Illusion |title=Intimate Strangers: The Culture of Celebrity |url=https://archive.org/details/intimatestranger00schi |location=Garden City, NY |publisher=Doubleday |pages=88–208 |isbn= |author-link= }} Discussion of Mailer’s insights about Marlon Brando, Marilyn Monroe, Ernest Hemingway and John F. Kennedy. | |||
* {{Anchor|Schrader (1961)}}{{cite journal |last=Schrader |first=George Alfred |date=December 1961 |title=Norman Mailer and the Despair of Defiance |url= |journal=Yale Review |volume=51 |issue= |pages=267–280 |access-date= }} Rpt: [[#Braudy (1972)|Braudy (1972)]]. Argues that hipsterism is not existentialism, but a violent variant of romanticism based on “libidinal urges.” | |||
* {{Anchor|Schultz (2015)}}{{cite book |last=Schultz |first=Kevin M. |date=2015 |title=Buckley and Mailer: The Difficult Friendship That Shaped the Sixties |url=https://archive.org/details/buckleymailerdif0000schu |location=New York |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |pages= |isbn= |author-link= }} A critical/biographical history of the friendship between Mailer and William F. Buckley concentrating on their frequently oppositional writing, politics, and public personae in the sixties. | |||
* {{Anchor|Schulz (1974)}}{{cite book |last=Schulz |first=Max F. |date=1974 |chapter=Norman Mailer’s Divine Comedy |title=Radical Sophistication: Studies in Contemporary Jewish-American Novelists |url=https://archive.org/details/radicalsophistic00schu |location=Athens, OH |publisher=Ohio University Press |pages=69–109 |isbn= |author-link= }} Examination of Mailer’s novels, with only modest procrusteanism, in a Dantesque framework. | |||
* {{Anchor|Schwenger (1984)}}{{cite book |last=Schwenger |first=Peter |date=1984 |title=Phallic Critiques: Masculinity and Twentieth-Century Literature |url= |location=London |publisher=Routledge and Kegan Paul |pages=24–36, 103–107 and passim |isbn= |author-link= }} Worthy exploration of Mailer’s rhetoric and obscenity. | * {{Anchor|Schwenger (1984)}}{{cite book |last=Schwenger |first=Peter |date=1984 |title=Phallic Critiques: Masculinity and Twentieth-Century Literature |url= |location=London |publisher=Routledge and Kegan Paul |pages=24–36, 103–107 and passim |isbn= |author-link= }} Worthy exploration of Mailer’s rhetoric and obscenity. | ||
* {{Anchor|Scott (1973)}}{{cite book |last=Scott |first=Nathan A., Jr. |date=1973 |chapter=Norman Mailer—Our Whitman |title=Three American Moralists: Mailer, Bellow, Trilling |url= |location=Notre Dame, IN |publisher=University of Notre Dame Press |pages=15–97 |isbn= |author-link= }} In detailed readings, Scott makes the case that Mailer, like Whitman, is a “spokesperson for the American conscience.” | * {{Anchor|Scott (1973)}}{{cite book |last=Scott |first=Nathan A., Jr. |date=1973 |chapter=Norman Mailer—Our Whitman |title=Three American Moralists: Mailer, Bellow, Trilling |url= |location=Notre Dame, IN |publisher=University of Notre Dame Press |pages=15–97 |isbn= |author-link= }} In detailed readings, Scott makes the case that Mailer, like Whitman, is a “spokesperson for the American conscience.” | ||