10,132
edits
Norman Mailer Society/News: Difference between revisions
Addition.
(Addition.) |
(Addition.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{:Norman Mailer Society/News/Tabs}} | {{:Norman Mailer Society/News/Tabs}} | ||
* '''2022-01-20''': [[Michael Mailer]] contextualizes the latest controversy surrounding Mailer and makes an argument for publishing companies to be a place for the “free exchange of ideas” in “[https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/what-norman-mailers-cancellation-reveals What Norman Mailer’s ‘Cancellation’ Reveals].” Via ''The Spectator''. | |||
* '''2022-01-17''': “[https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/01/17/mail-j17.html The effort to ‘delete’ American novelist Norman Mailer]” argues that “[t]he censorship of Mailer’s work has a thoroughly reactionary, antidemocratic content.” | * '''2022-01-17''': “[https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/01/17/mail-j17.html The effort to ‘delete’ American novelist Norman Mailer]” argues that “[t]he censorship of Mailer’s work has a thoroughly reactionary, antidemocratic content.” | ||
* '''2022-01-11''': “[https://bookandfilmglobe.com/book-and-film-globe-podcasts/bfg-podcast-037-norman-mailer-dont-look-up-and-losing-on-a-game-show/ BFG Podcast #037: Norman Mailer, ‘Don’t Look Up,’ and Losing on a Game Show]” wherein renowned book critic Carolyn Kellogg joins Neal Pollack to talk about the posthumous Norman Mailer controversy, [and] Carolyn refers to the second half of ''Harlot’s Ghost'' as a great book, and says that even when she didn’t agree with Mailer’s outrageous opinions, he always gave her something interesting to argue about. | * '''2022-01-11''': “[https://bookandfilmglobe.com/book-and-film-globe-podcasts/bfg-podcast-037-norman-mailer-dont-look-up-and-losing-on-a-game-show/ BFG Podcast #037: Norman Mailer, ‘Don’t Look Up,’ and Losing on a Game Show]” wherein renowned book critic Carolyn Kellogg joins Neal Pollack to talk about the posthumous Norman Mailer controversy, [and] Carolyn refers to the second half of ''Harlot’s Ghost'' as a great book, and says that even when she didn’t agree with Mailer’s outrageous opinions, he always gave her something interesting to argue about. | ||