Jump to content

User:JHarrell/sandbox: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Byline|last=Mosser|first=Jason|url=|abstract=|note=}}
{{Byline|last=Mosser|first=Jason|url=|abstract=|note=}}
BOTH NORMAN MAILER’S ''ST. GEORGE AND THE GODFATHER'' (1972) and Hunter S.
Thompson’s ''Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail, ’72'' (1973) deal with
the 1972 Nixon-McGovern presidential race. As a way of situating ''St. George''
and ''Campaign Trail'' in their aesthetic, cultural, and historical contexts, I want
to appropriate Kenneth Burke’s history-as-drama metaphor. To Burke, the
terms dramatic and dialectic are closely related, for history, as he explains in
''The Philosophy of Literary Form'', “is a ‘dramatic’ process, involving dialectical oppositions” (109). In 1972, rival political interests, Democrats and Republicans, as well as their presidential nominees, Richard Nixon and George
McGovern assumed that the roles of antagonists and protagonists engaged
in an ideological conflict between the dominant, pro-war establishment culture and an emergent, anti-war counterculture. Burke argues that “human
affairs being dramatic, the discussion of human affairs [as in campaign journalism] becomes dramatic criticism,” a rhetorical act (''Philosophy 116''). Sometimes, however, what promises at first to be a dramatically charged event,
like a political campaign, can fail to live up to the participants’ expectations,
and such was the case with the major parties’ conventions in 1972. As literary journalists, then, each the central character and shaping the consciousness
of his own narrative, Mailer and Thompson adopted their own characteristic strategies to meet the challenge of creating compelling narratives in the
relative absence of real-life drama.


Works Cited
Works Cited
33

edits