Jump to content

The Mailer Review/Volume 2, 2008/A New Politics of Form in Harlot's Ghost: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 95: Line 95:


==IV. The Novelist as the God that Fails and the Novel as Disinformation==
==IV. The Novelist as the God that Fails and the Novel as Disinformation==
Close to the end of the novel, Hubbard has some disconcerting thoughts. In a conversation with Bill Harvey ~a fictional character based on the real CIA
Close to the end of the novel, Hubbard has some disconcerting thoughts. In a conversation with Bill Harvey (a fictional character based on the real CIA station chief) suspicion is cast upon the loyalty of Hugh Montague, a.k.a. Harlot, who has been the primary influence over Harry’s career. Could Harlot, one of the most powerful leaders of the CIA, actually be a Soviet agent? This would make Harlot the complete opposite of everything he appears to be and would call into question all the values and ideology that Harry Hubbard assumes. In addition, since Harlot explains all of his efforts in Manichean terms of serving God against the Devil (echoes of Mailer), and if Harlot is a Soviet agent, then the absolute values assumed throughout the novel, and taught by Harlot, either collapse into nihilism and become self-serving or reverse their position: God representing democracy and capitalism is really evil and the Devil of Communism is really good. This has become a possibility that Harry’s experience with the CIA, particularly his truly disastrous efforts to overthrow the Cuban revolution and assassinate Fidel Castro, makes him inclined to consider seriously if the God of Capitalism is really the God or the Devil. How the entire novel is to be understood rests upon what side, if any, Harlot really serves.
station chief! suspicion is cast upon the loyalty of Hugh Montague, a.k.a. Harlot, who has been the primary influence over Harry’s career. Could Harlot, one of the most powerful leaders of the CIA, actually be a Soviet agent?
 
This would make Harlot the complete opposite of everything he appears to
 
be and would call into question all the values and ideology that Harry Hubbard assumes. In addition, since Harlot explains all of his efforts in Manichean terms of serving God against the Devil ~echoes of Mailer!, and if
 
Harlot is a Soviet agent, then the absolute values assumed throughout the
 
novel, and taught by Harlot, either collapse into nihilism and become selfserving or reverse their position: God representing democracy and capitalism is really evil and the Devil of Communism is really good. This has
 
become a possibility that Harry’s experience with the CIA, particularly his
truly disastrous efforts to overthrow the Cuban revolution and assassinate
Fidel Castro, makes him inclined to consider seriously if the God of Capitalism is really the God or the Devil. How the entire novel is to be understood rests upon what side, if any, Harlot really serves.


Harry remembers a conversation with Harlot about God and Evolution.
Harry remembers a conversation with Harlot about God and Evolution.
88

edits