Willie Morris, October 21, 1963: Difference between revisions

m
Added links and italics.
m (Added links, nudged formatting.)
m (Added links and italics.)
Line 5: Line 5:
::::::::::::::::::::October 21, 1963
::::::::::::::::::::October 21, 1963


Dear Willie,<ref>Mailer met [[w:Willie Morris|Morris]] in New York after Morris became editor of [[w:Harper’s|Harper’s]] in 1963. Mailer’s letter gives a hint of the lifelong tension in his writing life between his profound desire to write novels and the financial need to write shorter pieces of nonfiction. He resolved the problem, to some extent, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, by writing long nonfiction narratives that are fictive; they read like novels. Three of these, ''The Armies of the Night'' (1968), ''Miami and the Siege of Chicago'' (1968) and ''The Prisoner of Sex'' (1971) appeared first in ''Harper’s''. All three were nominated for the [[w:National Book Award|National Book Award]]; ''Armies'' won it and a [[w:Pulitzer Prize|Pulitzer Prize]] as well.</ref>  
Dear Willie,<ref>Mailer met [[w:Willie Morris|Morris]] in New York after Morris became editor of ''[[w:Harper’s|Harper’s]]'' in 1963. Mailer’s letter gives a hint of the lifelong tension in his writing life between his profound desire to write novels and the financial need to write shorter pieces of nonfiction. He resolved the problem, to some extent, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, by writing long nonfiction narratives that are fictive; they read like novels. Three of these, ''[[The Armies of the Night]]'' (1968), ''[[Miami and the Siege of Chicago]]'' (1968) and ''[[The Prisoner of Sex]]'' (1971) appeared first in ''Harper’s''. All three were nominated for the [[w:National Book Award|National Book Award]]; ''Armies'' won it and a [[w:Pulitzer Prize|Pulitzer Prize]] as well.</ref>  


Let me thank you for your letter, but writing articles has a bit of drudgery to it for me, and now I’m free, for a year at least, to work on a novel, so I think I’ll be keeping myself much to myself through this long winter. I’m glad you’re at ''Harper’s'' and let me wish you good luck in what you’re doing.
Let me thank you for your letter, but writing articles has a bit of drudgery to it for me, and now I’m free, for a year at least, to work on a novel, so I think I’ll be keeping myself much to myself through this long winter. I’m glad you’re at ''Harper’s'' and let me wish you good luck in what you’re doing.