User talk:Amylhester: Difference between revisions

From Project Mailer
(Added suggestions.)
 
(→‎Moved Intro: new section)
Line 4: Line 4:
# Do not number the notes. The letters are fine.
# Do not number the notes. The letters are fine.
That's it right now. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. Keep up the good work! —[[User:Jules Carry|Jules Carry]] ([[User talk:Jules Carry|talk]]) 09:13, 10 September 2020 (EDT)
That's it right now. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. Keep up the good work! —[[User:Jules Carry|Jules Carry]] ([[User talk:Jules Carry|talk]]) 09:13, 10 September 2020 (EDT)
== Moved Intro ==
Hello, I moved the introduction to [[The Mailer Review/Volume 2, 2008/A New Politics of Form in Harlot's Ghost|the article]] and made some tweaks. I think we can dispense with labeling the intro like it is in the journal. This is a tough article as far as notes and sources are concerned, so I’m happy to help you get it posted—though I’m sure you would do fine by yourself. —[[User:Jules Carry|Jules Carry]] ([[User talk:Jules Carry|talk]]) 07:51, 17 September 2020 (EDT)

Revision as of 07:51, 17 September 2020

Article Suggestions

Hi, I noticed that you are working on an article in your sandbox. Well done so far. I wanted to suggest a couple of things:

  1. No need to number the sections. I would also remove the “Introduction” section, as I think this is obvious.
  2. Do not number the notes. The letters are fine.

That's it right now. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. Keep up the good work! —Jules Carry (talk) 09:13, 10 September 2020 (EDT)

Moved Intro

Hello, I moved the introduction to the article and made some tweaks. I think we can dispense with labeling the intro like it is in the journal. This is a tough article as far as notes and sources are concerned, so I’m happy to help you get it posted—though I’m sure you would do fine by yourself. —Jules Carry (talk) 07:51, 17 September 2020 (EDT)