Talk:The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/The Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision: Difference between revisions
(Added note.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Remediating Notes== | ==Remediating Notes== | ||
{{u|CLedoux}} Really great work. Please remove the parenthetical citation in-text; these are not needed with the shortened footnotes. The footnotes should be exactly where the parenthetical citations appear in the text; please do not move these. Also, the texts real quotes “” have been replaced by fang quotes " — do you know how this happened? —[[User:Grlucas|Grlucas]] ([[User talk:Grlucas|talk]]) 08:00, 21 June 2021 (EDT) | {{u|CLedoux}} Really great work. Please remove the parenthetical citation in-text; these are not needed with the shortened footnotes. The footnotes should be exactly where the parenthetical citations appear in the text; please do not move these. Also, the texts real quotes “” have been replaced by fang quotes " — do you know how this happened? —[[User:Grlucas|Grlucas]] ([[User talk:Grlucas|talk]]) 08:00, 21 June 2021 (EDT) | ||
: {{u|Grlucas}} I've removed the parenthetical citations and corrected the placement of the shortened footnotes. I have no idea how the real quotes were replaced with fang quotes. I was directly copying and pasting from the source. Is this is an issue? [[User:CLedoux|CLedoux]] ([[User talk:CLedoux|talk]]) 10:21, 26 June 2021 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:21, 26 June 2021
Remediating Notes
CLedoux Really great work. Please remove the parenthetical citation in-text; these are not needed with the shortened footnotes. The footnotes should be exactly where the parenthetical citations appear in the text; please do not move these. Also, the texts real quotes “” have been replaced by fang quotes " — do you know how this happened? —Grlucas (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2021 (EDT)