Talk:The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/The Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision

Add topic
Active discussions
< Talk:The Mailer Review‎ | Volume 3, 2009
Revision as of 14:18, 26 June 2021 by Grlucas (talk | contribs) (Reply.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Remediating Notes

CLedoux Really great work. Please remove the parenthetical citation in-text; these are not needed with the shortened footnotes. The footnotes should be exactly where the parenthetical citations appear in the text; please do not move these. Also, the texts real quotes “” have been replaced by fang quotes " — do you know how this happened? —Grlucas (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2021 (EDT)

Grlucas I've removed the parenthetical citations and corrected the placement of the shortened footnotes. I have no idea how the real quotes were replaced with fang quotes. I was directly copying and pasting from the source. Is this is an issue? CLedoux (talk) 10:21, 26 June 2021 (EDT)
@CLedoux: Progress! Though these items still need attention: (1) there should be no space between the punctuation mark and your footnote code (see: PM:RA#In-text_Citations; (2) end punctuation needs to be moved to inside the closing quotation mark (when applicable); (3) and, yes, fang quotation marks (and apostrophes) need to be corrected. Thanks. —Grlucas (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2021 (EDT)
@CLedoux and Grlucas: I worked on these issues, but I would go over the article again to be sure there aren’t more errors that popped up. --Jules Carry (talk) 15:03, 26 June 2021 (EDT)
@Jules Carry: 💯 Great work, as usual!! 👍🏼 —Grlucas (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2021 (EDT)
Return to "The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/The Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision" page.