User talk:AWalker: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Jules Carry (talk | contribs) (Comment on 6/27 update.) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Bio Moved== | |||
I | I moved your bio to your user page, the correct location. —[[User:Jules Carry|Jules Carry]] ([[User talk:Jules Carry|talk]]) 08:36, 29 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
== Balter Article == | |||
Good job working on a tough article. However, and {{u|Grlucas}} has [[Talk:The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/Secret Agency: American Individualism in Oswald's Tale and Libra|pointed out]], there are ''way too many'' mistakes getting through in your remediation. Please be more careful; it literally took me two hours this morning to correct all the errors and typos in your work, see [https://projectmailer.net/index.php?title=The_Mailer_Review%2FVolume_3%2C_2009%2FSecret_Agency%3A_American_Individualism_in_Oswald%27s_Tale_and_Libra&type=revision&diff=15054&oldid=15036 my edits]. I appreciate your attention to detail as you finish the article. Also, you should be giving a summary of each of your edits before saving. Thanks! —[[User:Jules Carry|Jules Carry]] ([[User talk:Jules Carry|talk]]) 09:14, 25 June 2021 (EDT) | |||
Seriously, all of the corrections that I made yesterday have been reverted by [https://projectmailer.net/index.php?title=The_Mailer_Review%2FVolume_3%2C_2009%2FSecret_Agency%3A_American_Individualism_in_Oswald%27s_Tale_and_Libra&type=revision&diff=15097&oldid=15054 your recent edit]. I know this article is challenging, and I'm trying to help you out, but you cannot delete parts of the article that have been fixed. Are you even paying attention to these messages? I would appreciate a response. --[[User:Jules Carry|Jules Carry]] ([[User talk:Jules Carry|talk]]) 09:35, 27 June 2021 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 08:35, 27 June 2021
Bio Moved
I moved your bio to your user page, the correct location. —Jules Carry (talk) 08:36, 29 May 2021 (EDT)
Balter Article
Good job working on a tough article. However, and Grlucas has pointed out, there are way too many mistakes getting through in your remediation. Please be more careful; it literally took me two hours this morning to correct all the errors and typos in your work, see my edits. I appreciate your attention to detail as you finish the article. Also, you should be giving a summary of each of your edits before saving. Thanks! —Jules Carry (talk) 09:14, 25 June 2021 (EDT)
Seriously, all of the corrections that I made yesterday have been reverted by your recent edit. I know this article is challenging, and I'm trying to help you out, but you cannot delete parts of the article that have been fixed. Are you even paying attention to these messages? I would appreciate a response. --Jules Carry (talk) 09:35, 27 June 2021 (EDT)