10,115
edits
The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/The Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision: Difference between revisions
The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/The Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision (view source)
Revision as of 15:36, 26 June 2021
, 26 June 2021Corrected displaytitle.
m (Minor corrections. Removed working banner.) |
m (Corrected displaytitle.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style= | {{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-size:22px;">{{BASEPAGENAME}}/</span>{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} | ||
{{MR03}} | {{MR03}} | ||
{{Byline|last=Fleming|first=James R.|url=https://prmlr.us/mr03fle |abstract=Norman Mailer had a unique ability to carry contrary notions simultaneously, without resorting to simple, practical resolution in order to resolve dilemmas. Mailer is part of the Romantic tradition in terms of his understanding of reality. He does not wholly resist resolution to incommensurable situations and concepts. Instead, he takes Keats’s notion of negative capability a step further than Keats and his contemporaries.}} | {{Byline|last=Fleming|first=James R.|url=https://prmlr.us/mr03fle |abstract=Norman Mailer had a unique ability to carry contrary notions simultaneously, without resorting to simple, practical resolution in order to resolve dilemmas. Mailer is part of the Romantic tradition in terms of his understanding of reality. He does not wholly resist resolution to incommensurable situations and concepts. Instead, he takes Keats’s notion of negative capability a step further than Keats and his contemporaries.}} | ||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
{{Review}} | {{Review}} | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision, The}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Faith of Romanticism: Dialectical Synthesis and Norman Mailer’s English Romantic Vision, The}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Articles (MR)]] | ||