663
edits
The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/Heading Off Satisfaction in Tough Guys Don’t Dance: Difference between revisions
The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/Heading Off Satisfaction in Tough Guys Don’t Dance (view source)
Revision as of 17:42, 28 June 2021
, 28 June 2021Corrected display title.
Jules Carry (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-size:22px;">{{BASEPAGENAME}}/</span>{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} {{MR03}} {{Byline|last=Manon|first=Hugh S.|note=A Lacanian reading of Norman Ma...") |
Jules Carry (talk | contribs) m (Corrected display title.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-size:22px;">{{BASEPAGENAME}}/</span> | __NOTOC__{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-size:22px;">{{BASEPAGENAME}}/</span>Heading Off Satisfaction in ''Tough Guys Don’t Dance''}} | ||
{{MR03}} | {{MR03}} | ||
{{Byline|last=Manon|first=Hugh S.|note=A Lacanian reading of Norman Mailer’s ''Tough Guys Don’t Dance'' (1987) in which the film can be understood as a kind of short-circuited noir amnesia narrative, which at the same time suppresses all of the stylistic excesses of noir, in effect subverting subversion itself. |url=https://prmlr.us/mr03man}} | {{Byline|last=Manon|first=Hugh S.|note=A Lacanian reading of Norman Mailer’s ''Tough Guys Don’t Dance'' (1987) in which the film can be understood as a kind of short-circuited noir amnesia narrative, which at the same time suppresses all of the stylistic excesses of noir, in effect subverting subversion itself. |url=https://prmlr.us/mr03man}} | ||