Lipton’s Journal/February 7, 1955/489: Difference between revisions

m
Added hover notes.
(Created page.)
 
m (Added hover notes.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LJtop}}
{{LJtop}}
Before I go on with this sexual hypothesis, I think what I’m trying to say would be clarified if I were to underline another difference between the sup and the er. The er is formless matter, the sup is matterless form—so the sup gives form to the material of er. (Sup understood of course as {{LJ:S}}, er as {{LJ:H}}.) (Man’s mind and body engage in a perpetual ''supper-super''.) (Add: stupor—the thingness of supper and super.)  
Before I go on with this sexual hypothesis, I think what I’m trying to say would be clarified if I were to underline another difference between the {{LJ:sup}} and the {{LJ:er}}. The er is formless matter, the sup is matterless form—so the sup gives form to the material of er. (Sup understood of course as {{LJ:S}}, er as {{LJ:H}}.) (Man’s mind and body engage in a perpetual ''supper-super''.) (Add: stupor—the thingness of supper and super.)  


To understand the orgasm one must realize that the life er is given its shape, duration, intensity, and “quality” by the form in which the sup permits it. Without the sup there would not be an orgasm, there would be merely the state of perpetual waxing and waning tumescence. But the sup as form as society, demands shape, demands that one action cease and another begin for that is the health of society. And indeed the health of man-in-society, that is, S-man.  
To understand the orgasm one must realize that the life er is given its shape, duration, intensity, and “quality” by the form in which the sup permits it. Without the sup there would not be an orgasm, there would be merely the state of perpetual waxing and waning tumescence. But the sup as form as society, demands shape, demands that one action cease and another begin for that is the health of society. And indeed the health of man-in-society, that is, S-man.