10,132
edits
Talk:Norman Mailer’s Letters on An American Dream, 1963–1969: Difference between revisions
Talk:Norman Mailer’s Letters on An American Dream, 1963–1969 (view source)
Revision as of 06:18, 4 April 2019
, 4 April 2019→Letter Format: Reply.
(→Letter Format: Reply) |
m (→Letter Format: Reply.) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:::{{reply to|Grlucas}} Unfortuantely, with the formatting from the sandbox example, the addresses spill out of the box and the signature wraps around to the next line. A few colons less and they would fit. But the two letters available for viewing are not the same format. Which to use with our letter postings in our sandboxes? [[User:Namir Riptide|Namir Riptide]] ([[User talk:Namir Riptide|talk]]) 00:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC) | :::{{reply to|Grlucas}} Unfortuantely, with the formatting from the sandbox example, the addresses spill out of the box and the signature wraps around to the next line. A few colons less and they would fit. But the two letters available for viewing are not the same format. Which to use with our letter postings in our sandboxes? [[User:Namir Riptide|Namir Riptide]] ([[User talk:Namir Riptide|talk]]) 00:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::{{reply to|Namir Riptide}} Sandboxes are unnecessary in this case. Just work on the letters in the main space. Scary... | ::::{{reply to|Namir Riptide}} Sandboxes are unnecessary in this case. Just work on the letters in the main space. Scary... | ||
:::::{{reply to|Grlucas}} Still using them to play around with formatting and editing is okay, yes? And i have run into another problem . the Letters i got from our student talk do not have pages for me to add them. | |||
::::::{{reply to|Namir Riptide}} You may use your sandbox for anything you'd like. I'm not sure what you mean by "do not have pages"? —[[User:Grlucas|Grlucas]] ([[User talk:Grlucas|talk]]) 11:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
I was also thinking that instead of introducing the letters, we put the introductory comments in footnotes. The intros made sense in a book format, but footnotes might make more sense here. What say you? —[[User:Grlucas|Grlucas]] ([[User talk:Grlucas|talk]]) 00:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC) | I was also thinking that instead of introducing the letters, we put the introductory comments in footnotes. The intros made sense in a book format, but footnotes might make more sense here. What say you? —[[User:Grlucas|Grlucas]] ([[User talk:Grlucas|talk]]) 00:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
:I hink knowing what is going on when reading the letters may help in understanding why the letter is important to be posted. [[User:Namir Riptide|Namir Riptide]] ([[User talk:Namir Riptide|talk]]) 01:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC) | :I hink knowing what is going on when reading the letters may help in understanding why the letter is important to be posted. [[User:Namir Riptide|Namir Riptide]] ([[User talk:Namir Riptide|talk]]) 01:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC) | ||