Talk:Lipton’s Journal
Entry Dates
December 1, 1954
| # | NM# | First Words | x-Refs | Cut | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Perhaps the artist is less | |||
| 2 | 2 | Lipton's seems to open one | |||
| 3 | 3 | Fucking is perhaps an approach | |||
| 4 | 4 | In relation to (1) | x | Link to L1. | |
| 5 | 5 | The concentration camp novel | x | Unclear x-ref # in note. | |
| 6 | 6 | One should always listen attentively | |||
| 7 | 7 | Herbert A[ptheker]. said of Lipton’s | |||
| 8 | 8 | In modern jazz, one feels | |||
| 9 | 9 | Thoreau’s beautiful remark | |||
| 10 | 10 | I upset Herbert [Aptheker] by saying | |||
| 11 | 11 | In a short novel | x |
December 8, 1954
| # | NM# | First Words | x-Refs | Cut | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 12 | On should always try to | x |
- December 17, 1954
- December 28, 1954
- December 29, 1954
- December 31, 1954
- January 3, 1955
- January 20, 1955
- January 24, 1955
- January 25, 1955
- January 26, 1955
- January 27, 1955
- January 31, 1955
- February 1, 1955
- February 2, 1955
- February 7, 1955
- February 10, 1955
- February 14, 1955
- February 21, 1955
- February 22, 1955
- March 4, 1955
Questions
- What do we want to do with omitted entry numbers? Just skip them? Or should they be included in the digital version but not the printed?
- Are the numbers on Donna’s transcript the new, correct numbers? (I know Mike said that Mailer mis-numbered some entries.)
- Should each entry date have its own index page? Perhaps each numbered entry could be summarized here?
- Should each numbered entry should have its own (sub)page? I think yes.
- Should each numbered entry have a title other than a number? Each could have a shortcut, so if the title is
Lipton’s Journal/December 1, 1954/1, the shortcut could beLJ1or justL1. - Should we categorize numbered entries? Thematically? Style of entry?