User:KWatson/sandbox: Difference between revisions

KWatson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
KWatson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 114: Line 114:
avenger in the name of both the Jews, who showed the Arabs where to go, and the Irish who never won a war.
avenger in the name of both the Jews, who showed the Arabs where to go, and the Irish who never won a war.


In “A Course in Filmmaking,” Mailer argues that after the advent of
In “A Course in Filmmaking,” Mailer argues that after the advent of sound, film started to mimic theater, and that the work of film should be to get away from this mimicry in order to accomplish things that can only be accomplished on film. As films that are uniquely filmic, Mailer gives the example of ''The Maltese Falcon'', but also of the Marx Brothers’ films, in which the brothers “stampeded over every line of a script and tore off in enough directions to leave concepts fluttering like ticker tape on the mysterious nature of the movie art” (“Course” 129). The Marx brothers are important ancestors in Mailer’s filmic genealogy, in part because they too are Jews who remix ethnicity on film, as Chico becomes Italian and Zeppo becomes the brothers’ WASPy foil. And like Mailer’s films, much of the chaos and anarchy that unfurls in the Marx Brothers’ films stems from sound, in the form of elaborate musical numbers, Groucho’s wordplay, Chico’s Italian accent and piano playing, Harpo’s horn-honking, and even his silence. For both the Marx Brothers and Mailer, the work of cinema is to unravel itself, to make and unmake a universe in the same space, to challenge conventions. Where the Marx brothers wreak havoc, for example, upon the university in ''Horse feathers'', and upon dictatorship in ''Duck Soup'', Mailer wreaks havoc upon language and good taste as he attempts to create the film with the most “repetitive pervasive obscenity of any film ever made” with ''Wild, 90'' and upon both his own voice and the human eardrum with the perpetual yelling of Lt. Pope in ''Beyond the Law''. Mailer even tells us, “''Wild 90'' seems close to nothing so much as the Marx Brothers doing improvisations on ''Little Caesar'' with the addition of a free run of obscenity equal to ''Naked Lunch'' or ''Why Are We in Vietnam?''” (“Some Dirt” 90). It is as though Mailer sees ''Wild 90'' as an almost unimaginable supplement to the Marx Brothers’ oeuvre—a vision of what their tough Jewish contribution to cinema would look like had they ever assumed the roles of mafiosi.
sound, film started to mimic theater, and that the work of film should be to
get away from this mimicry in order to accomplish things that can only be
accomplished on film.As films that are uniquely filmic,Mailer gives the ex
ample of The Maltese Falcon, but also of the Marx Brothers’films, in which
the brothers“stampeded over every line of a script and tore off in enough di
rections to leave concepts fluttering like ticker tape on the mysterious nature
of the movieart”(“Course” ).TheMarxbrothersareimportantancestors
in Mailer’s filmic genealogy, in part because they too are Jews who remix
ethnicity on film, as Chico becomes Italian and Zeppo becomes the broth
ers’ WASPyfoil.And like Mailer’s films,much of the chaos and anarchy that
unfurls in the Marx Brothers’ films stems from sound, in the form of elab
orate musical numbers,Groucho’s wordplay,Chico’s Italian accent and piano
playing, Harpo’s horn-honking, and even his silence. For both the Marx
Brothers and Mailer,the work of cinemaistounravel itself,to make and un
make a universe in the same space, to challenge conventions. Where the
Marx brothers wreak havoc, for example, upon the university in Horse
feathers, and upon dictatorship in Duck Soup, Mailer wreaks havoc upon
language and good taste as he attempts to create the film with the most
“repetitive pervasive obscenity of any film ever made” with Wild , and
uponbothhisownvoiceandthehumaneardrumwiththeperpetualyelling
of Lt. Pope in Beyond the Law. Mailer even tells us,“Wild seems close to
nothing so much as the Marx Brothers doing improvisations on Little Cae
sar with the addition of a free run of obscenity equal to Naked Lunch orWhy
AreWeinVietnam?”(“SomeDirt” ).ItisasthoughMailer sees Wild as
an almost unimaginable supplement to the Marx Brothers’ oeuvre—a vi
sion of what their tough Jewish contribution to cinema would look like had
they ever assumed the roles of mafiosi.