Jump to content

User talk:CVinson/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Project Mailer
CVinson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
CVinson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 114: Line 114:
Oswald’s Tale) is the instrument of a death which lives forever in the shadowy ambiguity of Margot Macomber’s true intent, and which brings to a
Oswald’s Tale) is the instrument of a death which lives forever in the shadowy ambiguity of Margot Macomber’s true intent, and which brings to a
close the short, happy, existential life of the protagonist.
close the short, happy, existential life of the protagonist.
Part One of Hemingway’s To Have and Have Not () opens with an action sequence in which two politically opposed groups of Cubans kill each
other with, among other guns, a mm. Luger, a  gauge shotgun, and a .
Thompson submachine gun. Later in the same section of the book, the protagonist Harry Morgan, a modern pirate like his namesake Henry Morgan
(?–: a Welsh buccaneer in the Caribbean, later acting governor of
Jamaica, –) carries out the dangerous mission of transporting (and
double-crossing) illegal Chinese immigrants with the aid of a fairly standard
but versatile battery consisting of a Winchester - lever action carbine, a  gauge pump shotgun, and“the Smith andWesson thirty-eightspecial I had
when I was on the police force up in Miami“ (Hemingway, To Have ).
In Part Two, Harry is badly wounded in his right arm, which he subsequently loses, by the gunfire of law enforcement agents while smuggling
liquor from Cuba. But in Part Three, the longest and most intense section of
the book, he (literally) single-handedly kills, with his Thompson submachine gun, four Cuban revolutionaries escaping from a bank robbery. And
yet, a true existential character trapped in a naturalistic world, he mutters
with his dying breath this credo: “No matter how a man alone ain’t got no
bloody fucking chance” ().

Revision as of 18:52, 31 March 2025

FIREARMS IN THE WORKS OF
HEMINGWAY AND MAILER
BARRY H. LEEDS

BY NOW IT IS MOUTHING A TRUISM TO POINT OUT THAT FIREARMS have played an iconic role in American history. Starting with this axiomatic assumption, one finds that guns are virtually ubiquitous in the works of those two peculiarly American authors, Ernest Hemingway and Norman Mailer. Sometimes mere accoutrements or plot devices, they are more often significant thematically and symbolically.

Occasionally, serendipitous connections between the two authors present themselves. The best example of these may be the case of the 6.5 mm. Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. At the outset of A Farewell to Arms (1929), Hemingway describes how

the troops were muddy and wet in their capes; their rifles were
wet and under their capes the two leather cartridge-boxes on the
front of the belts, gray leather boxes heavy with the packs of clips
of thin, long 6.5 mm. cartridges, bulged forward under the capes
so that the men, passing on the road, marched as though they
were six months gone with child. (4)

This crucial passage foreshadows the thematic connection of rain, pregnancy, war and death in the novel, notably that of Catherine Barkley, which makes Farewell so clearly a naturalistic work.

The 6.5 mm. Mannlicher-Carcano, standard issue for the Italian army throughout the first half of the twentieth century, was subsequently sold cheaply in large numbersthrough mail-order houses worldwide.One of these rifles, equipped with a 4-power scope, was ordered by Lee Harvey Oswald in 1963, forty-five years after the 1918 setting of Hemingway’s Farewell, and used to assassinate John F. Kennedy, as elaborated upon in Mailer’s Oswald’s Tale: An American Mystery (1995). This death of monumental, tragic proportions was brought about by the use of a $10 gun. Also in A Farewell to Arms, Frederick Henry feels faintly ridiculous in obeying the regulation that a uniformed officer be armed with a pistol even when out of combat (148).Yet after his convalescence in Milan he uses his pistol (of unspecified caliber, but described as “regulation”) during the next campaign to shoot one of two sergeants for disobedience and desertion (204). The point of the passage, one of many emphasizing the anti-heroic message of the novel, is that Henry and the enlisted man Bonello (who administers the coup de grâce) are so inured to death in war that they are entirely dispassionate about it.

Most clearly parallel to this scene is the opening of An American Dream (1965) in which Stephen Richards Rojack kills four German machine-gunners with his .30 caliber M1 carbine. Portentously set under a full moon, the episode illustrates Rojack’s capacity for lethal violence and his perception that murder has a sexual aspect to it (Mailer, American 3-6). Yet, in a later passage in the New England woods with his wife Deborah, he is shamed by her superior ability to hunt small animals with a .22 rifle, another of the scenes that illuminates the constant competition in their intense love/hate relationship: “And in fact she was an exceptional hunter. She had gone on safari with her first husband and killed a wounded lion charging ten feet from her throat, she dropped an Alaskan bear with two shots to the heart (30/06 Winchester)” (35).

Moving to the beginning of Mailer’s career, it is obvious that every character in The Naked and the Dead () is issued regulation small arms: the officers with caliber . ACP Model A pistols, the enlisted men with -  M Garand rifles (as distinguished from Rojack’s smaller M carbine) or . Thompson submachine guns. Perhaps the most crucial episode in which one of these weapons figures is late in the book, during the abortive attempt by I & R platoon to climb Mt. Anaka, when Red Valsen rebels against Staff Sgt. Croft’s leadership and is forced to obey at gunpoint: “Croft . . . unslung his rifle, cocked the bolt leisurely. . . . It was worthless to temporize. Croft wanted to shoot him” (–).When Red capitulates, it signals the end of all resistance to Croft, which is emblematic of the allegorical conclusion by Mailer that reactionaries would dominate post-war America and which emphasizes the novel’s pessimistic message, its naturalistic bias

If war is the most obvious arena in which guns figure, it is not hard to find the others: hunting and, in urban civilian life, criminal pursuits. The most striking of the latter occurs in Hemingway’s great story, “The Killers,” and Mailer’s  murder mystery, Tough Guys Don’t Dance. In the former, the two hit men, almost robotic in their mindless, inexorable commitment to a job that must be done, pursue their prey, ex-boxer Ole Anderson, with a chilling, leisurely assurance and sawed-off  gauge shotguns. In the first cinematic version of the story (), a classic film noir with Burt Lancaster and Ava Gardner in their first starring roles, the killers (one of whom is William Conrad, later of TV“Cannon” fame) use more pedestrian Smith & Wesson Model  . Special revolvers. As in Hemingway’s story, Ole Anderson, in true naturalistic fashion, passively awaits his death.

In Tough Guys Don’t Dance, several of the seven violent deaths are carried out by the three matching . automatic pistols bought by Meeks Wardley Hilby III, including his own suicide and that of his doppelgänger Lonnie Pangborn. These parallels in death echo the sexual parallels in the lives of these characters and the novel presents a sexual nexus in which virtually every character is attached carnally to several others.

In a more significant book, The Executioner’s Song (), the career criminal Gary Gilmore traffics in guns and murders with one. He is inept with the . automatic he uses in his two cold-blooded assassinations, for he shoots himself in the hand after the second murder, and the bleeding wound casts immediate suspicion upon him and leads to his quick capture by the police. This episode is in line with Gary’s failures throughout the book and his entire life.

In Why Are We in Vietnam? (), the metaphorical juxtaposition of over-armed Texans hunting in Alaska, and the parallel depredations of the U.S. Army upon the population of Vietnam is best expressed in the passage where DJ lists at length the battery of guns brought on the hunt, especially by his father, Rusty:

Which brings up Rusty, who travels like a big-ass hunter. . . . yeah, he got for instance a . Jeffrey on a Mauser Magnum action with a Circassian walnut stock, one love of a custom job by Biesen with Zeiss Zielklein  /X on Griffin & Howe side mount for Gun #. Gun # is Model  Winchester rechambered to . Weatherly Magnum, Stith Bear Cub scope, birds’-eye maple stock, etcetera. . . . Gun # is Winslow Regimental Grade  mm. Remington Magnum with FN Supreme  action and Premium Grade Douglas barrel, ivory and ebony inlays in the stock, basket weave carving on both sides of the forearm and pistol grip, Redfield Jr. mounts, Redfield  X – X variable scope. (–)

Despite this impressive array of weaponry, Rusty selfishly fails his son by his lack of a sportsmanlike hunter’s ethics. Later in the novel, it is only by divesting themselves of all weapons and other equipment that DJ and his best friend Tex Hyde are able to experience a transcendent oneness with nature.

In a similar situation but without the devastating irony, Hemingway equips the title character in “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” with a - rifle and  grain solid slugs for lion and Cape buffalo. The professional hunter, Robert Wilson, based on the famous Philip Percival with whom Hemingway had hunted in Africa, carries a “shockingly big-bored” . Gibbs “with a muzzle velocity of two tons” (). Here, Hemingway makes an error in nomenclature and physics, since muzzle velocity is measured in feet per second, and muzzle energy in foot pounds.Yet the . Gibbs, a highly specialized big game hunting rifle of which only eighty were ever manufactured, presents a very impressive picture in the mind’s eye. Finally, in one of the greatest examples of controlled ambiguity in literature, Macomber’s wife Margot, “shot at the buffalo with the . Mannlicher” (), killing her husband. This . mm Mannlicher (a fine sporting arm quite different from the rough, mass-produced Mannlicher Carcano of Farewell and Oswald’s Tale) is the instrument of a death which lives forever in the shadowy ambiguity of Margot Macomber’s true intent, and which brings to a close the short, happy, existential life of the protagonist.

Part One of Hemingway’s To Have and Have Not () opens with an action sequence in which two politically opposed groups of Cubans kill each other with, among other guns, a mm. Luger, a  gauge shotgun, and a . Thompson submachine gun. Later in the same section of the book, the protagonist Harry Morgan, a modern pirate like his namesake Henry Morgan (?–: a Welsh buccaneer in the Caribbean, later acting governor of Jamaica, –) carries out the dangerous mission of transporting (and double-crossing) illegal Chinese immigrants with the aid of a fairly standard but versatile battery consisting of a Winchester - lever action carbine, a  gauge pump shotgun, and“the Smith andWesson thirty-eightspecial I had when I was on the police force up in Miami“ (Hemingway, To Have ).

In Part Two, Harry is badly wounded in his right arm, which he subsequently loses, by the gunfire of law enforcement agents while smuggling liquor from Cuba. But in Part Three, the longest and most intense section of the book, he (literally) single-handedly kills, with his Thompson submachine gun, four Cuban revolutionaries escaping from a bank robbery. And yet, a true existential character trapped in a naturalistic world, he mutters with his dying breath this credo: “No matter how a man alone ain’t got no bloody fucking chance” ().