Jump to content

The Mailer Review/Volume 4, 2010/A Visionary Hermeneutic Appropriation: Meditations on Hemingway’s Influence on Mailer: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
APKnight25 (talk | contribs)
175 edits
Added author link.
APKnight25 (talk | contribs)
175 edits
Removal test.
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Byline |last=Nakjavani |first=Erik |url=TBD |abstract=TBD}}
{{Byline |last=Nakjavani |first=Erik |url=TBD |abstract=TBD}}


<blockquote>
 
[T]here is nothing in the critical field that should be of greater
philosophical interest or prove more rewarding to analysis than
the progressive modification of one mind by the work of
another.{{sfn|Valéry|1972|p=241}}
</blockquote>


'''I. Prologue'''
'''I. Prologue'''
Line 60: Line 55:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Hemingway’s style had an ability to hit the young writers in the
Hemingway’s style had an ability to hit the young writers in the
gut, and they weren’t the same after that.{{sfn|Mailer|198|p=298}}
gut, and they weren’t the same after that.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Retrieved from "https://projectmailer.net/pm/The_Mailer_Review/Volume_4,_2010/A_Visionary_Hermeneutic_Appropriation:_Meditations_on_Hemingway’s_Influence_on_Mailer"