Talk:Lipton’s Journal: Difference between revisions
(Created page for project notes.) |
m (Update.) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
# Should each entry date have its own index page? Perhaps each numbered entry could be summarized here? | # Should each entry date have its own index page? Perhaps each numbered entry could be summarized here? | ||
# Should each numbered entry should have its own (sub)page? I think yes. | # Should each numbered entry should have its own (sub)page? I think yes. | ||
# Should each numbered entry have a title other than a number? Each could have a shortcut, so if the title is <code><nowiki>Lipton’s Journal/December 1, 1954/1</nowiki></code>, the shortcut could be <code>LJ1</code> or just <code>L1</code>. | |||
# Should we categorize numbered entries? Thematically? Style of entry? | # Should we categorize numbered entries? Thematically? Style of entry? | ||
Revision as of 15:02, 29 May 2019
Entry Dates
- December 1, 1954
- December 8, 1954
- December 17, 1954
- December 28, 1954
- December 29, 1954
- December 31, 1954
- January 3, 1955
- January 20, 1955
- January 24, 1955
- January 25, 1955
- January 26, 1955
- January 27, 1955
- January 31, 1955
- February 1, 1955
- February 2, 1955
- February 7, 1955
- February 10, 1955
- February 14, 1955
- February 21, 1955
- February 22, 1955
- March 4, 1955
Questions
- What do we want to do with omitted entry numbers? Just skip them? Or should they be included in the digital version but not the printed?
- Are the numbers on Donna’s transcript the new, correct numbers? (I know Mike said that Mailer mis-numbered some entries.)
- Should each entry date have its own index page? Perhaps each numbered entry could be summarized here?
- Should each numbered entry should have its own (sub)page? I think yes.
- Should each numbered entry have a title other than a number? Each could have a shortcut, so if the title is
Lipton’s Journal/December 1, 1954/1, the shortcut could beLJ1or justL1. - Should we categorize numbered entries? Thematically? Style of entry?