The Mailer Review/Volume 4, 2010/A Visionary Hermeneutic Appropriation: Meditations on Hemingway’s Influence on Mailer: Difference between revisions
APKnight25 (talk | contribs) Added page 163. |
APKnight25 (talk | contribs) m Created blockquote. |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Byline |last=Nakjavani |first=Erik |url=TBD |abstract=TBD}} | {{Byline |last=Nakjavani |first=Erik |url=TBD |abstract=TBD}} | ||
<blockquote> | |||
[T]here is nothing in the critical field that should be of greater | [T]here is nothing in the critical field that should be of greater | ||
philosophical interest or prove more rewarding to analysis than | philosophical interest or prove more rewarding to analysis than | ||
the progressive modification of one mind by the work of | the progressive modification of one mind by the work of | ||
another.{{sfn|Valéry|1972|p=241}} | another.{{sfn|Valéry|1972|p=241}} | ||
</blockquote> | |||
'''I. Prologue''' | '''I. Prologue''' | ||