User:JHarrell/sandbox: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Byline|last=Mosser|first=Jason|url=|abstract=|note=}}
{{Byline|last=Mosser|first=Jason|url=|abstract=|note=}}


BOTH NORMAN MAILER’S ''ST. GEORGE AND THE GODFATHER'' (1972) and Hunter S.
BOTH NORMAN MAILER’S ''ST. GEORGE AND THE GODFATHER'' (1972) and Hunter S. Thompson’s ''Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail, ’72'' (1973) deal with the 1972 Nixon-McGovern presidential race. As a way of situating ''St. George'' and ''Campaign Trail'' in their aesthetic, cultural, and historical contexts, I want to appropriate Kenneth Burke’s history-as-drama metaphor. To Burke, the terms dramatic and dialectic are closely related, for history, as he explains in ''The Philosophy of Literary Form'', “is a ‘dramatic’ process, involving dialectical oppositions” (109). In 1972, rival political interests, Democrats and Republicans, as well as their presidential nominees, Richard Nixon and George McGovern assumed that the roles of antagonists and protagonists engaged in an ideological conflict between the dominant, pro-war establishment culture and an emergent, anti-war counterculture. Burke argues that “human affairs being dramatic, the discussion of human affairs [as in campaign journalism] becomes dramatic criticism,” a rhetorical act (''Philosophy 116''). Sometimes, however, what promises at first to be a dramatically charged event, like a political campaign, can fail to live up to the participants’ expectations, and such was the case with the major parties’ conventions in 1972. As literary journalists, then, each the central character and shaping the consciousness of his own narrative, Mailer and Thompson adopted their own characteristic strategies to meet the challenge of creating compelling narratives in the relative absence of real-life drama.
Thompson’s ''Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail, ’72'' (1973) deal with
the 1972 Nixon-McGovern presidential race. As a way of situating ''St. George''
and ''Campaign Trail'' in their aesthetic, cultural, and historical contexts, I want
to appropriate Kenneth Burke’s history-as-drama metaphor. To Burke, the
terms dramatic and dialectic are closely related, for history, as he explains in
''The Philosophy of Literary Form'', “is a ‘dramatic’ process, involving dialectical oppositions” (109). In 1972, rival political interests, Democrats and Republicans, as well as their presidential nominees, Richard Nixon and George
McGovern assumed that the roles of antagonists and protagonists engaged
in an ideological conflict between the dominant, pro-war establishment culture and an emergent, anti-war counterculture. Burke argues that “human
affairs being dramatic, the discussion of human affairs [as in campaign journalism] becomes dramatic criticism,” a rhetorical act (''Philosophy 116''). Sometimes, however, what promises at first to be a dramatically charged event,
like a political campaign, can fail to live up to the participants’ expectations,
and such was the case with the major parties’ conventions in 1972. As literary journalists, then, each the central character and shaping the consciousness
of his own narrative, Mailer and Thompson adopted their own characteristic strategies to meet the challenge of creating compelling narratives in the
relative absence of real-life drama.


Especially compared to the 1968 Democratic convention, which both Mailer and Thompson attended, the 1972 conventions were uneventful. Mailer had begun covering presidential campaigns with the Democratic convention in 1960, which resulted in his groundbreaking journalistic essay “Superman Comes to the Supermarket” (originally titled “Superman Comes to the Supermart”). Four years later, during the Republican campaign in 1964, he followed with “In the Red Light” about the Republican convention that nominated Barry Goldwater. In the following years, the war in Vietnam and the civil rights movement further divided the country while millions of white, middle-class kids were tuning in, turning on, and dropping out. Mailer biographer J. Michael Lennon records that, in the summer of 1968, Mailer believed that “the Republic hovered on the edge of revolution, nihilism, and lines of police on file to the horizon”(405); thus, the campaigns gave promise of drama on a historic scale. While the Republicans were all but certain to support a Nixon candidacy, the Democrats were divided over the pro and anti-war forces within the party and were reeling from the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. while Mayor Daley’s police and National Guard brutalized protestors in the streets. As a witness to the scene, Mailer described the Democratic convention as “martial, dramatic, bloody, vainglorious, riotous, noble, tragic, corrupt, vicious, vomitous, appalling,[and] cataclysmic”(3).In the aftermath of both conventions that year, Mailer, writing at characteristically breakneck speed, responded with a ground-breaking book-length report, ''Miami and the Siege of Chicago'' (1968).


(1968).
Works Cited
Works Cited
* Booth, Wayne C. (1973). "Loathing and Ignorance on the Campaign Trail". Columbia Journalism Review. 12 (4): 7–12. access-date= 2/9/21
* Booth, Wayne C. (1973). "Loathing and Ignorance on the Campaign Trail". Columbia Journalism Review. 12 (4): 7–12. access-date= 2/9/21
33

edits