Jump to content

The Mailer Review/Volume 2, 2008/The Heart of the Nation: Jewish Values in the Fiction of Norman Mailer: Difference between revisions

Place paragraphs 5, 6 and 7.
(Placed the Works Cited Page as Jules Carry had it, before I accidently deleted his work.)
(Place paragraphs 5, 6 and 7.)
Line 19: Line 19:


<blockquote>[A] life...directed by one’s faith in the necessity of action is a life committed to the notion that the substratum of existence is the search, the end meaningful but mysterious.{{sfn|Mailer|1959|p=341}}</blockquote>  
<blockquote>[A] life...directed by one’s faith in the necessity of action is a life committed to the notion that the substratum of existence is the search, the end meaningful but mysterious.{{sfn|Mailer|1959|p=341}}</blockquote>  
By committing an action, the “hipster,” as Mailer called his heroes in those days, activates his whole being, not just his intellect or his physical being, but also his spirit and his soul. Action creates. It is a means of survival, for through action, instinctive and intuitive, he defines himself from within. As Mailer said in the essay “Minorities,” one of his most important statements on his Jewish identity, he becomes an “artistic nerve” reacting and sensitive to his being. This notion of meaningful action motivates nearly all of Mailer’s heroes from Sergeant Croft in '' Naked '', to Rojack in '' American Dream '' and even one could argue to Jesus in '' Gospel ''. Action is “holy,” a method for defining one’s soul and not “secular” aimed at achieving material results in the external world. In the '' Pirkei Avoth '', a collection of sayings by the Rabbis in the Talmud, Rabbi Ben Azzai notes “that one mitzvah leads to another mitzvah and a sin will lead to another” {{sfn|Siddur|1984|p=544}} One grows in strength as one performs holy deeds just as sinful deeds sap the soul. Stephen Rojack can only fight with Barney Oswald Kelly after he has put himself through lesser acts of bravery and self-discovery
The acts that best serve as the conduit for this development are those that depend on a connection with other people. Sexual intercourse and violence depend most on the “healthy” communion with the reality of other beings. I know that these ideas have been a source of glee or misunderstanding for critics of Mailer and here is not the place to explore these notions, though I have to say that in my reading the use of the terms '' sex '' and '' violence '' is more metaphoric than literal. He does not, for example, advocate murder as a way of life —the tragedy of the Jack Abbott episode brings this home— but Mailer, taking a page from another misunderstood Jew, Wilhelm Reich, instead suggests that any action that goes against the norms of society is by implication “violent,” and any action that seeks to open communication with the reality of another is “sexual.” Because of this theory, he denounces any social phenomenon that denies a man the means “to purge his violence” and hence prevent his soul from “... being ... frozen with implacable self- hatred for his cowardice” (AFM 347)
Mailer extends this notion of mitzvah, of meaningful action, to his concerns about the spiritual value of humankind in a corrupt and fallen world. In the face of a threat against the integrity of the self, individuals cannot shirk their responsibility to discover their own set of values. Only by this discovery can they reclaim themselves from the surrounding chaos. Mailer’s concerns are totally spiritual: Humankind, he believes, is God’s agent, fighting His battles. Human activity becomes a symbolic drama where, as Charles Feidelson notes in his text '' Symbolism and American Literature '', “every passage of life, enmeshed in the vast context of God’s plan, possesses a delegated meaning” {{sfn| Feidelson|1953|p=79}} Richard Poirier in his book on Mailer states it best, “[Mailer] is dependent on a past which is essentially mythic and he prefers to think of himself as someone living within the perils of time while knowing he is the carrier of life which is not wholly his own to waste” {{sfn|Poirier|1972|p=105}} This is a very unchristian approach to life. In this scenario, there is no Jesus to save one, no afterlife that will reward one. Since Jesus cannot call on Jesus to save himself, ironically Jesus in Mailer’s world is the ultimate (Jewish) hero. His Jesus is full of doubt, not quite sure of his role, questioning his sayings and more importantly his actions. Mailer pointed out the genesis of his creative theory in '' The Spooky Art '':
<blockquote> I decided my character had to be more of a man than a god, an existential man, dominated by the huge cloud that he is the Son of God. Jesus, as the protagonist, doesn’t feel worthy, but he is ready nonetheless to do his best every step of the way. Not in command of every situation, but will do his best. And he does have his startling successes.{{sfn|Mailer|2005|p=87}}</blockquote>
Every action, then, that individuals perform has a significance that detracts or adds to the sum of all meaning, ordering chaos, inventing form, and flowing into the flux of Time, every action, individually realized and existentially self- defining is a dance over the hot coals of life. No scene in '' Gospel '' brings this out more than Jesus’s encounter with the Devil, the most admired section of the novel. In this section, the naïve Jesus tackles a being of infinite seductiveness, power, and wit. (Like Milton, Mailer finds himself giving some of the best lines to the Devil, which may be why he returned to this character for his last novel.) The Devil uses every trick in the book from the physical to the spiritual, from hallucinations to lying to undermine Jesus, but the Son is up to the task and if anything, by fighting the Devil he discovers his own powers and destiny.
<blockquote> If I could increase in my powers ... perhaps the world of men might multiply in virtue with me. So I had begun to believe in my Father .... I had been tested, had proved loyal, and now my tongue began to feel clean.{{sfn|Mailer|2005| |p=57}}</blockquote>
While Jesus knows who his father is, he still has to learn who he is and make the connection between the two so that God’s plans can be fulfilled.
<blockquote> I was obliged to wonder. Why had the Lord left me alone with Satan? Was it to scourge me of an excess of piety? Before long I would learn that there might be truth in this. There was work to do, and it could not be accomplished on one’s knees.{{sfn|Mailer|2005| |p=57}}</blockquote>
In a way we are all children of God, as Mailer noted in the aforementioned interview:
<blockquote> God wants to do more and gave us free will precisely because we’re God’s children .... I see God as a creative artist ... but not all powerful. And not all-good. And so, as an artist, God wants us to go further than God went. {{sfn|Shaikh|2007|}} </blockquote>
Human beings therefore have lives that are not theirs to waste, as Cherry explains in '' An American Dream '':
<blockquote> I always end up with something like the idea that God is weaker because I didn’t turn out well .... I believe God is just doing His best to learn from what happens to some of us.{{sfn|Mailer |1965|p=197}}</blockquote>
Mailer, though, gives an interesting spin on this essentially Jewish idea. In his telling, God moves from being all- powerful and an artist par excellence to ironically a sort of conservative economist, harvesting his energies in a way that would make the most ardent environmentalist happy. Again, in the '' Nextbook '' interview, he expounds on this long -held credo:
<blockquote> The world is much too fraught with peril and much too important a creation, to have it as a stage play where we do what we do, work at how we work, and if we please God, we go to heaven, if we displease we go to hell. Very wasteful, totally uneconomic. {{sfn|Shaikh|2007|}}</blockquote>
I am reminded of that wonderful discussion in '' Tough Guys Don’t Dance '' about the way that God plays the odds in a football game:
<blockquote> “Because footballs ... take funny bounces. It is not practical to get better than four out of five. That’s good enough. If [God] wanted to take account of the physics of every bounce, He’d have to do a million times more work in His calculations in order to get up from eighty to ninety-nine percent. That’s not economical. He’s got too many other things to work at.” {{sfn|Abraham|1984|p=160}}</blockquote>
Mailer liked this idea so much, he repeated it virtually verbatim in '' Harlot’s Ghost ''!


===Citations===  
===Citations===  
13

edits