User:KJordan/sandbox: Difference between revisions

I fixed everything in the sandbox and copied it onto the main article. It will be finished by tomorrow night.
No edit summary
(I fixed everything in the sandbox and copied it onto the main article. It will be finished by tomorrow night.)
Line 15: Line 15:


Other writers have made similar claims in connection with other fighters.
Other writers have made similar claims in connection with other fighters.
Jack Dempsey’s “overwhelming power made many people overlook the calculation that went into every punch he threw,” Roger Kahn writes in ''A Flame of Pure Fire''.“In that regard, he was a thinking, even intellectual boxer.” In the
Jack Dempsey’s “overwhelming power made many people overlook the calculation that went into every punch he threw,” Roger Kahn writes in ''A Flame of Pure Fire''. “In that regard, he was a thinking, even intellectual boxer.” In the
first volume of ''A Man without Qualities'', published not long after Dempsey’s reign as heavyweight champion ended, novelist Robert Musil prefigured Torres and D’Amato with observations like this one: “the tricks and
first volume of ''A Man without Qualities'', published not long after Dempsey’s reign as heavyweight champion ended, novelist Robert Musil prefigured Torres and D’Amato with observations like this one: “the tricks and
dodges used by an inventive mind in going through the logical operations of
dodges used by an inventive mind in going through the logical operations of
Line 23: Line 23:


Part of boxers’ “culture,” in the view of Torres and his fellow thinkers, is
Part of boxers’ “culture,” in the view of Torres and his fellow thinkers, is
the ability to lie successfully. As Jeremy Campbell notes in his so-called history of falseness, ''A Liar’s'' ''Tale'',“when winning is the important factor, deceitfulness is a kind of ethic....” From a technical standpoint, Ali did plenty
the ability to lie successfully. As Jeremy Campbell notes in his so-called history of falseness, ''A Liar’s'' ''Tale'', “when winning is the important factor, deceitfulness is a kind of ethic....” From a technical standpoint, Ali did plenty
“wrong,” but excelled nonetheless because of his cleverness, his ability to con
“wrong,” but excelled nonetheless because of his cleverness, his ability to con
his opponents. He perfected the liar’s ethic.
his opponents. He perfected the liar’s ethic.
Line 62: Line 62:
looking at it. Boxing is much more than two brutes beating up on each other.
looking at it. Boxing is much more than two brutes beating up on each other.
It is also more complicated than one fighter tricking an unprepared dupe:
It is also more complicated than one fighter tricking an unprepared dupe:
mismatches may be a part of the game, but they are boring.When the fighters are well matched physically and also shrewd strategists, with each seeking to exploit the other’s desire to find an opening, an advantage, a
mismatches may be a part of the game, but they are boring. When the fighters are well matched physically and also shrewd strategists, with each seeking to exploit the other’s desire to find an opening, an advantage, a
weakness—then the sport rises to the level of art.
weakness—then the sport rises to the level of art.


Line 72: Line 72:
sport’s mental aspect, which Torres so prizes, comes into play when physical abilities are comparable. Ali, the “Louisville Lip,” was able to back up his bluster, even if he did so with an unorthodox style.
sport’s mental aspect, which Torres so prizes, comes into play when physical abilities are comparable. Ali, the “Louisville Lip,” was able to back up his bluster, even if he did so with an unorthodox style.


The idea that boxers, individuals who choose to engage in a braindamaging game, are smart might strike the uninitiated as peculiar if not
The idea that boxers, individuals who choose to engage in a brain damaging game, are smart might strike the uninitiated as peculiar if not
ridiculous. Indeed, the strangeness of associating fighters with intelligence
ridiculous. Indeed, the strangeness of associating fighters with intelligence
cause some to doubt that Torres actually wrote his books ~he also published
cause some to doubt that Torres actually wrote his books ~he also published
a biography of Tyson!. A rumor suggested that Mailer actually wrote Torres’s
a biography of Tyson!. A rumor suggested that Mailer actually wrote Torres’s
portions of the Ali book. Jonathan Rendell, in his brilliantly titled ''This''
portions of the Ali book. Jonathan Rendell, in his brilliantly titled ''This''
''Bloody Mary Is the Last Thing I Own'', recounts hearing a version of it.“Mailer
''Bloody Mary Is the Last Thing I Own'', recounts hearing a version of it. “Mailer
wrote it for him,” the man on the next barstool explained to Rendell. “That
wrote it for him,” the man on the next barstool explained to Rendell. “That
was the deal they had. Torres taught Mailer how to box and Mailer wrote
was the deal they had. Torres taught Mailer how to box and Mailer wrote
Line 132: Line 132:
a character,” he writes in Only in America: The Life and Crimes of Don King.
a character,” he writes in Only in America: The Life and Crimes of Don King.
“That’s why writers and filmmakers are drawn to it. Almost everyone in
“That’s why writers and filmmakers are drawn to it. Almost everyone in
boxing is a colorful story teller with a touch of lunacy or larceny.” It is certainly true that he chose to focus on one of boxing’s colorful characters in King. A former numbers runner who killed two men, King became fabulously wealthy by using the rhetoric of racial solidarity to sign black boxers to his promotional company and then exploit them mercilessly,according to Newfield’s account. Newfield finds conniving and cunning not
boxing is a colorful story teller with a touch of lunacy or larceny.” It is certainly true that he chose to focus on one of boxing’s colorful characters in King. A former numbers runner who killed two men, King became fabulously wealthy by using the rhetoric of racial solidarity to sign black boxers to his promotional company and then exploit them mercilessly, according to Newfield’s account. Newfield finds conniving and cunning not
only on the business side of the sport, but in the fights themselves. He discusses the Ali-Foreman bout in terms very similar to Mailer’s, writing: “Boxing is based on deceit. Fighters are taught to lie—to conceal fatigue, mask
only on the business side of the sport, but in the fights themselves. He discusses the Ali-Foreman bout in terms very similar to Mailer’s, writing: “Boxing is based on deceit. Fighters are taught to lie—to conceal fatigue, mask
pain, disguise intent with a feint, deny an injury, look one way and punch
pain, disguise intent with a feint, deny an injury, look one way and punch
Line 151: Line 151:
Albert Camus describes boxers as “gods with cauliflower ears,” giving some
Albert Camus describes boxers as “gods with cauliflower ears,” giving some
indication of the respect he has for athletes who, like Sisyphus, persevere
indication of the respect he has for athletes who, like Sisyphus, persevere
through ultimately pointless endeavors. He also transmutes physical combat into the equivalent of a matter of language, viewing a fight as though
through ultimately pointless endeavors. He also transmutes physical combat into the equivalent of a matter of language, viewing a fight as though it were an argument. Fighters’ representative capabilities—their amply
it were an argument. Fighters’ representative capabilities—their amply
documented tendency to be regarded by spectators as the embodiment
documented tendency to be regarded by spectators as the embodiment
of a race, an ethnicity or a nationality—offers writers plenty of material
of a race, an ethnicity or a nationality—offers writers plenty of material
40

edits