10,132
edits
The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/Meeting Mailer: Difference between revisions
The Mailer Review/Volume 3, 2009/Meeting Mailer (view source)
Revision as of 06:53, 27 May 2021
, 27 May 2021Added abstract.
(Created page.) |
m (Added abstract.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-size:22px;">{{BASEPAGENAME}}/</span>{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-size:22px;">{{BASEPAGENAME}}/</span>{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} | ||
{{MR03}} | {{MR03}} | ||
{{Byline|last=Moyer|first=Kermit|url=https://prmlr.us/mr03moy}} | {{Byline|last=Moyer|first=Kermit |abstract=A professor recounts the events surrounding his meeting with Norman Mailer at American University in 1972. |url=https://prmlr.us/mr03moy}} | ||
{{dc|dc=I|n the fall of 1971, when I was a new assistant professor}} at American University in Washington, DC, I taught a somewhat experimental course of my own design called “The Self as Paradigm” that focused on Norman Mailer and Robert Lowell, arguably the preeminent living American prose writer and poet at the time. In October of that year, I wrote to Mailer, mentioning the course and asking if he would be interested in coming to AU to talk about his film, ''Maidstone''. The problem was, I told him, that finding money for this kind of project had become a bit like finding loose change in a skid-row payphone. Although I was sure his usual fee would be way beyond our means, I asked him to let me know if he would consider such a speaking engagement and, if so, exactly how high the financial hurdles would be. A few days later, I got the following thoughtful reply: | {{dc|dc=I|n the fall of 1971, when I was a new assistant professor}} at American University in Washington, DC, I taught a somewhat experimental course of my own design called “The Self as Paradigm” that focused on Norman Mailer and Robert Lowell, arguably the preeminent living American prose writer and poet at the time. In October of that year, I wrote to Mailer, mentioning the course and asking if he would be interested in coming to AU to talk about his film, ''Maidstone''. The problem was, I told him, that finding money for this kind of project had become a bit like finding loose change in a skid-row payphone. Although I was sure his usual fee would be way beyond our means, I asked him to let me know if he would consider such a speaking engagement and, if so, exactly how high the financial hurdles would be. A few days later, I got the following thoughtful reply: | ||