Talk:Norman Mailer: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{cquote|The mark of mediocrity is to look for precedent.}} | {{cquote|The mark of mediocrity is to look for precedent.}} | ||
{{cquote|Writing books is the closest men ever come to childbearing.}} | |||
{{cquote|Ultimately a hero is a man who would argue with the gods, and so awakens devils to contest his vision. The more a man can achieve, the more he may be certain that the devil will inhabit a part of his creation.|width=50%}} |
Revision as of 07:11, 27 December 2019
“ | I got a sense of the power of restraint from Hemingway, which is the smallest way to put it, because I got much more than that from him. I learned the power of simple language in English. He showed what a powerful instrument English is if you keep the language simple, if you don’t use too many Latinate words. And from Faulkner I learned the exact opposite, that excess can be thrilling, that, “Don’t hold yourself in. Don’t rein yourself in. Go all the way. Go over the top. Overdo it.” And between the two, it’s almost as if you’ve now been given your parameters. This is the best of one extreme and this is the best of another. And somewhere between the two you may be able to find your style in time to come. | ” |
— Norman Mailer, The Academy of Achievement Interview, June 12, 2004 |
“ | The mark of mediocrity is to look for precedent. | ” |
“ | Writing books is the closest men ever come to childbearing. | ” |
“ | Ultimately a hero is a man who would argue with the gods, and so awakens devils to contest his vision. The more a man can achieve, the more he may be certain that the devil will inhabit a part of his creation. | ” |