Lipton’s Journal/February 14, 1955/600: Difference between revisions
(Created page.) |
m (Added note.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LJtop}} | {{LJtop}} | ||
The malfunction of entering-leaving is the health of the State. This is where Sociostasis attacks the {{LJ:er}} for pure er is capable of instantaneous entering and leaving. The pillars of society like Stalin, Chamberlain, the D.A.R.s, my Aunt Nan, Larry, etc. have their anxiety over letting something new enter to be taken. They also cannot let go. Stalinism’s strength and weakness is that they have attacked the entering-leaving (birth-dying) synapses (what is the word I want? It’s not liaisons, nor synapses—patience, m’boy). Stalinism’s strength and weakness is that they have attacked the entering-leaving conduits of their people. The frustration produces their unilinear strength, their weaknesses before flexings. | The malfunction of entering-leaving is the health of the State. This is where Sociostasis attacks the {{LJ:er}} for pure er is capable of instantaneous entering and leaving. The pillars of society like Stalin, Chamberlain, the D.A.R.s, my Aunt Nan, Larry,{{LJ:Alson}} etc. have their anxiety over letting something new enter to be taken. They also cannot let go. Stalinism’s strength and weakness is that they have attacked the entering-leaving (birth-dying) synapses (what is the word I want? It’s not liaisons, nor synapses—patience, m’boy). Stalinism’s strength and weakness is that they have attacked the entering-leaving conduits of their people. The frustration produces their unilinear strength, their weaknesses before flexings. | ||
{{Notes|title=note|width=60em}} | |||
{{LJnav}} | {{LJnav}} | ||
[[Category:February 14, 1955]] | [[Category:February 14, 1955]] | ||
Revision as of 18:39, 24 April 2021
The malfunction of entering-leaving is the health of the State. This is where Sociostasis attacks the er for pure er is capable of instantaneous entering and leaving. The pillars of society like Stalin, Chamberlain, the D.A.R.s, my Aunt Nan, Larry,[1] etc. have their anxiety over letting something new enter to be taken. They also cannot let go. Stalinism’s strength and weakness is that they have attacked the entering-leaving (birth-dying) synapses (what is the word I want? It’s not liaisons, nor synapses—patience, m’boy). Stalinism’s strength and weakness is that they have attacked the entering-leaving conduits of their people. The frustration produces their unilinear strength, their weaknesses before flexings.
note
