The Mailer Review/Volume 4, 2010/Looking at the Past: Nostalgia as Technique in The Naked and the Dead and For Whom the Bell Tolls: Difference between revisions

meaningful on a personal and collective level” (). Rather than simply brushing it off as a form of camp or romanticism, I argue that nostalgia is a central component in enabling individuals to create worldviews, while also

nostalgia in The Naked and the Dead and For Whom the Bell Tolls as a literary technique. In each, nostalgia is deliberately invoked as a means to help

the reader understand or contextualize the narrative. As a result, nostalgia

fills in chronological gaps in the texts, thus pulling readers deeper into the

storylines. Hemingway and Mailer are also able to use nostalgia to interpret

broader societal issues.

The Naked and the Dead launched Mailer’s career (“War”). At twenty-five, the author stood atop the literary world, with fame and wealth at his side. The enduring power of the book, however, is its exploration beyond the traditional scope of the war novel. Rather than cast the battle as simply one of good versus evil, Mailer penetrates deeply into issues at humanity’s core. He showcases both the horror and humor of war, wadding it into a single existential romp through the jungles of tiny Pacific island Anopopei.

One of the interesting techniques Mailer uses in exploring the lives of the

men fighting on the island is a device he calls “The Time Machine,” which

takes the reader to events in the men’s lives prior to their service.While Time

offhandedly labeled these simply “flashbacks” and likened them to John Dos

Passos’ use of realistic snapshots in the U.S.A. trilogy, Mailer’s portraits are

not toss-off pieces, but instead provide information central to the overall

tone and interpretation of the novel (“War”).

In the ten stories that comprise The Time Machine, Mailer offers the

reader detail regarding each subject’s life before the Army, essentially establishing a link between the person’s past and present. Many of them reveal

From this viewpoint, The Time Machine pieces point toward Mailer’s predecessors in American naturalism,such as Theodore Dreiser and Frank Norris. However, there is a nostalgic strain that runs through them as well. The combination of realism and nostalgia displays the young author’s skill in storytelling and purposely crafting an impression for the reader, as if hinting toward a nostalgic past within the naturalistic framework is a way of lessening the violence and disparity in these sections.

For example, Mailer shows Red Valsen’s duality, almost lovingly describing him as having “an expression of concentrated contempt” and “tired eyes, a rather painful blue . . . quiet” (). With deft writing, Mailer also creates the suffocating Montana mines of the man’s youth, as well as the open road

town, getting drunk in a flatcar on Saturday night is still fun. The horizon extends for a million miles over the silver cornfields” (). Without resorting to the fake sentimentality that marks the contemporary definition of nostalgia, Mailer uses the great American myth/nostalgic view of the open road

Mailer certainly understood the realist aspects of The Time Machine essays and The Naked and the Dead as a whole. But to consider them nothing

more than simple reportage, or “massive amounts of research,seemingly assembled rather than written . . . in a crude unexpanded note form,” as Nigel

Anopopei (). Three years after publishing the novel, Mailer told The New

York Times that he respected, but felt hamstrung, by “that terrible word naturalism” (Breit ). Obviously, for the author, there was more at stake with

Perhaps not surprisingly, given Mailer’s years at Harvard, Robert Hearn’s

Time Machine section,titled“The Addled Womb,” is the deepest exploration.

In this piece, Mailer allows Hearn to use his past as a springboard in becoming a different person. At first, Hearn looks back on his past with nostalgic feelings, despite his difficult relationship with his bullying father and

passive mother. During college though, the young man goes through a transformation. He emerges wiser in many ways, but lost. He tells one girlfriend,

“I don’t feel sick. I just feel blank . . . superior, I don’t give a damn, I’m just

waiting around” (). Hearn becomes so enmeshed in the sensitivities of the

still looked promising, “the power that leaped at you, invited you” (). But,

weaker and the things still stood” (). A scion of the Midwest with unlimited resources, he is nonetheless beaten. In his defeat, he becomes part of the institution that he flailed against.

For Whom the Bell Tolls, Hemingway’s tale of guerrilla warfare in the Spanish mountains as seen through the eyes of American professor Robert Jordan, according to Michael K. Solow, “can be read as an indictment of war,

corrupt politics, and flawed humanity” (). The novel is also a study in details, as Jordan lives among Pablo’s bandits, falls in love with Maria/Rabbit,

means of providing context and explanation for Jordan’s decision to sacrifice himself and his guerrilla colleagues. Nostalgia in For Whom the Bell Tolls

is a necessary component in making this sacrifice have meaning. Particularly, Solow explains,when“[c]ontemporary readers also knew too well that

in . So, in a larger sense, the actual outcome of Jordan’s mission—from a rational perspective—is altogether moot” (). Hemingway uses Jordan’s nostalgic feelings for Spain before the war as a motivation for his actions in the novel.

an intellectual, he holds an acute, fact-based, and logical worldview. Jordan also sees the larger strategic picture, even on his last day, boosting his morale by thinking, “as long as we can hold them here we keep the fascists tied up. They can’t attack any other country until they finish with us.” But, then admitting, “You just watch now and do what you should” and chastising himself for “getting very pompous in the early morning” (). Given

bridge in his ever-present notebook, a kind of lifeline he clings to throughout the story. Thus, one reads, “He sketched quickly and happily; glad at last to have the problem under his hand; glad at last actually to be engaged upon it,” and recognizes the orderly, rational side of Jordan that puts him on this task, despite the risk.

emotion or feeling, which may have been an easier route to take, given the complexity of detail the author provides throughout the novel. Instead, the young guerrilla warrior has a past and thoughts about his personal history that have consequences for his current beliefs and actions. Jordan, for example, draws a distinction between the things he learns as an actor within the drama of war and the time he spent in Spain with its people for “parts of ten years before the war” (). He is able to balance the atrocities he participates in with the loving feelings as an outsider, but who

had put in the time to learn the nation and its people to the point, “He never felt like a foreigner in Spanish and they did not really treat him like a foreigner most of the time” (). In the end, Jordan decides he will take in everything, convincing himself “if he were going to form judgments he would form them afterwards” (). Yet, it is difficult to think that he could divorce himself from ten years of previous experiences in Spain or his love for the nation.

While Jordan holds both a rational side and a nostalgic vision of the past, Pilar presents a kind of anti-nostalgia in telling the story of the massacre at Avila. Although, even then, Pilar drapes the story in positive images of the past, when she was beautiful and young and Pablo was a strong, forceful leader. Hemingway emphasizes the importance of the speech by couching it in terms of a lecture, “as though she were speaking to a classroom,” the narrator explains (). Jordan, on the other hand, places a nostalgic sheen on the event.

write about the episode as she told it. His desire to get at “[w]hat we did. Not what the others did to us” (), points to balance Hemingway creates between the authentic history of the Spanish Civil War, which will be ultimately told by the winners, and the people of Spain: “You had to have

known the people before. You had to know what they had been in the village” (). The tension between authenticity and nostalgia creates a new way of looking at a world event witnessed by Hemingway and written about shortly after its end. With For Whom the Bell Tolls, Hemingway forced his readers, just as Pilar forced Jordan, to confess “that damned woman made me see it as though I had been there” (). The reader must address the relationship between authenticity and nostalgia, which Hemingway presents without overt sentimentality, giving nostalgia a prime place in how Jordan creates his powerful worldview.

or as a tool to sell products hides its effectiveness as a legitimate way of addressing the past, particularly in literature. In other words, nostalgia does not have to be automatically linked to an unrealistic or fanciful yearning for a romanticized past. As Michael Janover explains, “Nostalgia is the pain of homesickness,” which could be turned into a positive as an author creates characters that have thoughts and feelings about their history. His interpretation of “nostalgias,” defined as “the pangs of longing for another time, another place, another self . . . almost certainly romantic in seed and, potentially, corrosively decadent in growth” () can also be transformed into a useful device for creating literary figures.

Given that ''For Whom the Bell Tolls'' and ''The Naked and the Dead'' were published a mere eight years apart, the use of nostalgia within the narratives and as a literary technique speaks to the role of nostalgia in that era dominated by war, its consequences, and immediate aftermath. As Sprengler notes, the interpretation of nostalgia had gone through a transformation in the early years of the twentieth century “within modernity because of industrialization, technological modernization and urbanization” (). Leigh, for example, then views 'The Time Machine' sections of Mailer’s novel as fixing the characters “unalterably to their environments . . . to a reality that is shown

to be static and unchanging” (). Looking into the past, then, for some

memory, however, our experience of time is vastly more complicated” (–

). Breaking out of the chronological view also adds density to the narratives by revealing that time is a complex experience. For both Hemingway and Mailer, providing a multi-dimensional view of a character’s past that includes nostalgic impulses creates richer characters, ones that readers, in turn, empathize with as they struggle through the atrocities of warfare.