User:ADavis/sandbox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Byline|last=Kaufmann|first=Donald L.}} | {{Byline|last=Kaufmann|first=Donald L.|abstract=Mailer is placed within the American literary tradition as a direct descendent of late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century Naturalism.}} | ||
{{dc|dc=T|HE MAILER "SEEDS" STIRRED}}, as the Twentieth Century dawned and American literature soared. The last century would climax in the late 1920s, and | |||
achieve its final “coming of age,” now superior to its English and European | achieve its final “coming of age,” now superior to its English and European | ||
counterparts, soon to be the new superpower’s final word. | counterparts, soon to be the new superpower’s final word. | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
clearly many contemporary and later writers were inseminated with Whitman “seeds.”And Norman Mailer was one of those who had more than his | clearly many contemporary and later writers were inseminated with Whitman “seeds.”And Norman Mailer was one of those who had more than his | ||
share. For the Mailer scholar, legacy quotient is based more on his authorial singularity and less on the common characteristics of his generation of | share. For the Mailer scholar, legacy quotient is based more on his authorial singularity and less on the common characteristics of his generation of | ||
contemporary writers. Whitman’s death announced that the nineteenth-century American Realism of Howells and James had ended. In its wings | contemporary writers. Whitman’s death announced that the nineteenth-century American Realism of Howells and James had ended. In its wings {{pg|280|281}} | ||
was formed the new Literary Naturalism that might be called the “dynamic | was formed the new Literary Naturalism that might be called the “dynamic | ||
Line 144: | Line 145: | ||
But the “other” Davis, the literary careerist, was radically different, more | But the “other” Davis, the literary careerist, was radically different, more | ||
like the high-risk lifestyles of Crane and London. On news assignments, Davis actually tempted death. The press loved his go-for-broke front line {{pg|287| | like the high-risk lifestyles of Crane and London. On news assignments, Davis actually tempted death. The press loved his go-for-broke front line {{pg|287|288}} | ||
antics. He called the Spanish-American War “splendid fun” and took part in the Battle of San Juan Hill, and made Teddy Roosevelt and his Rough Riders famous. Davis became the newspapers’ darling. He had continuous access to elite personages from presidents to kings and queens, even the | antics. He called the Spanish-American War “splendid fun” and took part in the Battle of San Juan Hill, and made Teddy Roosevelt and his Rough Riders famous. Davis became the newspapers’ darling. He had continuous access to elite personages from presidents to kings and queens, even the |