User:JBawlson/sandbox: Difference between revisions

JBawlson (talk | contribs)
JBawlson (talk | contribs)
Line 23: Line 23:


Both authors saw literature as a weapon against cultural stagnation. Hemingway urged readers to break free from what they were taught to feel and create their own standards (Death 5, 10). Mailer put it succinctly: literature should “clarify a nation’s vision of itself” (Cannibals and Christians 98).
Both authors saw literature as a weapon against cultural stagnation. Hemingway urged readers to break free from what they were taught to feel and create their own standards (Death 5, 10). Mailer put it succinctly: literature should “clarify a nation’s vision of itself” (Cannibals and Christians 98).


This is not a passive project. It’s revolutionary. Mailer’s brand of existentialism, infused with American grit and spirituality, aimed to shake readers into greater awareness. Hemingway did the same, albeit with a more stoic subtlety.
This is not a passive project. It’s revolutionary. Mailer’s brand of existentialism, infused with American grit and spirituality, aimed to shake readers into greater awareness. Hemingway did the same, albeit with a more stoic subtlety.