The Mailer Review/Volume 4, 2010/A Visionary Hermeneutic Appropriation: Meditations on Hemingway’s Influence on Mailer: Difference between revisions

APKnight25 (talk | contribs)
Undo revision 20277 by APKnight25 (talk)
Tag: Undo
APKnight25 (talk | contribs)
m Added "8" after "198" to fix citation error.
Line 8: Line 8:
philosophical interest or prove more rewarding to analysis than
philosophical interest or prove more rewarding to analysis than
the progressive modification of one mind by the work of
the progressive modification of one mind by the work of
another.
another.{{sfn|Valéry|1972|p=241}}
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Line 60: Line 60:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Hemingway’s style had an ability to hit the young writers in the
Hemingway’s style had an ability to hit the young writers in the
gut, and they weren’t the same after that.{{sfn|Mailer|198|p=298}}
gut, and they weren’t the same after that.{{sfn|Mailer|1988|p=298}}
</blockquote>
</blockquote>