User:Chelsey.brantley/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Added another paragraph
Fixed minor typos
Line 45: Line 45:
one could not accuse Mailer of being an outright defender of the counterculture.
one could not accuse Mailer of being an outright defender of the counterculture.
But through his intimate sketches of the activists and his own experience
But through his intimate sketches of the activists and his own experience
as a fellow marcher,we do see images of greatness, of self-sacrifice and {{pg|484|485}}
as a fellow marcher, we do see images of greatness, of self-sacrifice and {{pg|484|485}}
patriotism. Most important, Mailer, as narrator/protagonist, gives Americans
patriotism. Most important, Mailer, as narrator/protagonist, gives Americans
outside the march a sense of what it was to be a demonstrator.
outside the march a sense of what it was to be a demonstrator.


One of Mailer’smain tasks as an author is to acquaint his readers with the
One of Mailer’s main tasks as an author is to acquaint his readers with the
character of the marchers themselves, so a primary concern of ''Armies'' is media bias as it affected the American public’s sentiments about the acts of resistance happening all around them. But the mainstream press was hawkish:
character of the marchers themselves, so a primary concern of ''Armies'' is media bias as it affected the American public’s sentiments about the acts of resistance happening all around them. But the mainstream press was hawkish:
before the Tet Offensive in January of 1968, “not a single major newspaper
before the Tet Offensive in January of 1968, “not a single major newspaper
Line 61: Line 61:
the unfair coverage that the press gave to the actions of the demonstrators
the unfair coverage that the press gave to the actions of the demonstrators
and how "[e]mphasis was put on every rock thrown, and a count was made of the windows broken. (There were, however, only a few.) But there was no
and how "[e]mphasis was put on every rock thrown, and a count was made of the windows broken. (There were, however, only a few.) But there was no
specificmention of The Wedge [a brutal crowd control technique,which resulted
specific mention of The Wedge [a brutal crowd control technique, which resulted
in beating of the marchers]. Indeed, stories [of police brutality]
in beating of the marchers]. Indeed, stories [of police brutality]
quickly disappeared."{{sfn|Mailer|1988|p=313-14}} This becomes evident as Mailer distinguishes
quickly disappeared."{{sfn|Mailer|1988|p=313-14}} This becomes evident as Mailer distinguishes