The Mailer Review/Volume 4, 2010/Ernest and Norman (Exit Music): Difference between revisions
Flowersbloom (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Flowersbloom (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Working}} <!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | {{Working}} <!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Byline|last=Kaufmann|first=Donald L.|url=https://projectmailer.net/pm/The_Mailer_Review/Volume_4,_2010/Ernest_and_Norman_(Exit_Music)|abstract=Hemingway’s suicidal shadows reinforced the literary truism that Mailer was | {{Byline|last=Kaufmann|first=Donald L.|url=https://projectmailer.net/pm/The_Mailer_Review/Volume_4,_2010/Ernest_and_Norman_(Exit_Music)|abstract=Hemingway’s suicidal shadows reinforced the literary truism that Mailer was Papa’s heir apparent for the postwar generation. In 1948 Hemingway was revisited in the guise of ''The Naked and the Dead''. Both men abided by the Neo-Primitive, a distrust of civilization and complication, a demand that man | ||
Papa’s heir apparent for the postwar generation.In | |||
shift to the natural and simple and go back to the tough-guy earth. | shift to the natural and simple and go back to the tough-guy earth. | ||
}} | }} | ||