<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://projectmailer.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lipton%E2%80%99s_Journal%2FFebruary_7%2C_1955%2F533</id>
	<title>Lipton’s Journal/February 7, 1955/533 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://projectmailer.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lipton%E2%80%99s_Journal%2FFebruary_7%2C_1955%2F533"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://projectmailer.net/index.php?title=Lipton%E2%80%99s_Journal/February_7,_1955/533&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T09:21:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://projectmailer.net/index.php?title=Lipton%E2%80%99s_Journal/February_7,_1955/533&amp;diff=14117&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Grlucas: Created page.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://projectmailer.net/index.php?title=Lipton%E2%80%99s_Journal/February_7,_1955/533&amp;diff=14117&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-04-19T20:33:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{LJtop}}&lt;br /&gt;
Yet, we cannot deny it. There seems to be some kind of general over-all benefit to psychoanalysis. Probably, it is so difficult to determine, more people are benefited than are hurt. If this be true, I have an idea why. In the very absence of meeting, in the essential square peg to round hole, the misapplied and erroneous {{LJ:S}}-concept of the analyst attached to the {{LJ:er}}-released matter there is a liberty for the patient to come to his or her own conclusions. I suspect that when the patient makes a poor transference, there are often surprisingly good results. This, at least, for Freudian analysts. What happens is that a self-analysis with an essentially unimportant but nonetheless not-to-be-ignored chaperone has taken place. The analyst says, “Dependency drives, castration fantasies”—the patient feels: and feels beneath words: “I know what love is, I know what power is, I know (and this is private {{LJ:H}} knowledge) that I am not as bad as I thought I was, but this I’m keeping to myself. If I give it to old Four-Eyes he’ll tack it on his article board, put it under glass, and give it a name.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, beneath the surface, a mighty ventilation takes place. On the surface there is guilt, hostility, pain, self-hatred—in the deep reaches of the er, there is shame, opening of rhythm, pleasure, self-love, and the suppressed H understanding and S admitting that one is not so bad after all. What characterizes the successful analysis is that the S has been dealt a blow, not the er. It isn’t that one learns to control one’s outrageous id, as Freudians would have it, but rather that the {{LJ:sup}} loses power, must take retreats, must admit some of its imposture. On the surface the analyst believes he has tamed the patient; what has happened is that the patient has out-foxed him. There was more than one girl I laid who said to me, “I’m not going to tell my analyst I’ve been sleeping with you until you leave town, because if I do, he’s going to fuck it up.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{LJnav}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:February 7, 1955]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Grlucas</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>