Lipton’s Journal/December 1, 1954/1 - Revision history

Grlucas: Tweak.

2021-03-08T13:46:05Z

Tweak.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 8 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{LJtop}}		{{LJtop}}
	Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent “sensitive” man.		Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent “sensitive” man.

	{{LJnav}}		{{LJnav}}
	[[Category:December 1, 1954]]		[[Category:December 1, 1954]]

Grlucas: Tweak.

2020-09-17T12:32:29Z

Tweak.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 17 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{LJtop}}		{{LJtop}}
	Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent “sensitive” man.		Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent “sensitive” man.

	{{LJnav}}		{{LJnav}}
	[[Category:December 1, 1954]]		[[Category:December 1, 1954]]

Grlucas: Tweak.

2020-07-04T19:57:42Z

Tweak.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 4 July 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~shortcut\|L1~~}}		{{LJtop}}
	Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent ~~‘sensitive’~~ man.		Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent “sensitive” man.

	{{LJnav}}		{{LJnav}}
	[[Category:December 1, 1954]]		[[Category:December 1, 1954]]

Grlucas: Added cat.

2019-06-06T15:16:45Z

Added cat.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 6 June 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:

	{{LJnav}}		{{LJnav}}
			[[Category:December 1, 1954]]

Grlucas: Added shortcut, but not sure about it.

2019-05-31T22:46:12Z

Added shortcut, but not sure about it.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 31 May 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{shortcut\|L1}}
	Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent ‘sensitive’ man.		Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent ‘sensitive’ man.

	{{LJnav}}		{{LJnav}}

Grlucas: Created page.

2019-05-29T21:22:37Z

Created page.

New page

Perhaps the artist is less sensitive than his audience. That is, he reacts with less emotion, less intensity, to experience than people who are not at all creative. His creativity (his need to synthesize) is merely the expression of less emotion, it being quite conceivable that emotion and language are antithetical. Thus the writer, seeing coldly, but able to see, touches upon matters which move him very little, and move his audience much. It is perfectly conceivable that the stupid man feels worlds of experience he can never communicate; he is actually far more sensitive than the intelligent ‘sensitive’ man.

{{LJnav}}